• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本原子弹幸存者低剂量辐射致癌死亡率的再分析:自举法和模拟方法。

Reanalysis of cancer mortality in Japanese A-bomb survivors exposed to low doses of radiation: bootstrap and simulation methods.

出版信息

Environ Health. 2009 Dec 9;8:56. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-56.

DOI:10.1186/1476-069X-8-56
PMID:20003238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2799447/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended annual occupational dose limit is 20 mSv. Cancer mortality in Japanese A-bomb survivors exposed to less than 20 mSv external radiation in 1945 was analysed previously, using a latency model with non-linear dose response. Questions were raised regarding statistical inference with this model.

METHODS

Cancers with over 100 deaths in the 0 - 20 mSv subcohort of the 1950-1990 Life Span Study are analysed with Poisson regression models incorporating latency, allowing linear and non-linear dose response. Bootstrap percentile and Bias-corrected accelerated (BCa) methods and simulation of the Likelihood Ratio Test lead to Confidence Intervals for Excess Relative Risk (ERR) and tests against the linear model.

RESULTS

The linear model shows significant large, positive values of ERR for liver and urinary cancers at latencies from 37 - 43 years. Dose response below 20 mSv is strongly non-linear at the optimal latencies for the stomach (11.89 years), liver (36.9), lung (13.6), leukaemia (23.66), and pancreas (11.86) and across broad latency ranges. Confidence Intervals for ERR are comparable using Bootstrap and Likelihood Ratio Test methods and BCa 95% Confidence Intervals are strictly positive across latency ranges for all 5 cancers. Similar risk estimates for 10 mSv (lagged dose) are obtained from the 0 - 20 mSv and 5 - 500 mSv data for the stomach, liver, lung and leukaemia. Dose response for the latter 3 cancers is significantly non-linear in the 5 - 500 mSv range.

CONCLUSION

Liver and urinary cancer mortality risk is significantly raised using a latency model with linear dose response. A non-linear model is strongly superior for the stomach, liver, lung, pancreas and leukaemia. Bootstrap and Likelihood-based confidence intervals are broadly comparable and ERR is strictly positive by bootstrap methods for all 5 cancers. Except for the pancreas, similar estimates of latency and risk from 10 mSv are obtained from the 0 - 20 mSv and 5 - 500 mSv subcohorts. Large and significant cancer risks for Japanese survivors exposed to less than 20 mSv external radiation from the atomic bombs in 1945 cast doubt on the ICRP recommended annual occupational dose limit.

摘要

背景

国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)建议的年职业剂量限值为 20mSv。此前,曾使用具有非线性剂量反应的潜伏期模型分析过 1945 年遭受小于 20mSv 外照射的日本原子弹幸存者的癌症死亡率。人们对该模型的统计推断提出了质疑。

方法

使用包含潜伏期的泊松回归模型分析了 1950-1990 年寿命研究中 0-20mSv 亚组中癌症死亡人数超过 100 人的队列,允许线性和非线性剂量反应。使用自举百分位和偏差校正加速(BCa)方法以及似然比检验模拟,得出超额相对风险(ERR)的置信区间,并对线性模型进行检验。

结果

线性模型显示,在潜伏期为 37-43 年时,肝脏和泌尿系统癌症的 ERR 值显著较大且为正。在胃(11.89 年)、肝脏(36.9)、肺(13.6)、白血病(23.66)和胰腺(11.86)的最佳潜伏期以及广泛的潜伏期范围内,低于 20mSv 的剂量反应呈强烈非线性。使用自举和似然比检验方法,ERR 的置信区间是可比的,BCa95%置信区间在所有 5 种癌症的潜伏期范围内均为正。对于胃、肝、肺和白血病,从 0-20mSv 和 5-500mSv 数据中得到了 10mSv(滞后剂量)的相似风险估计值。对于后三种癌症,在 5-500mSv 范围内,剂量反应呈显著非线性。

结论

使用具有线性剂量反应的潜伏期模型,肝脏和泌尿系统癌症的死亡率风险显著增加。对于胃、肝、肺、胰腺和白血病,非线性模型具有明显优势。自举和基于似然的置信区间在所有 5 种癌症中广泛可比,并且自举方法的 ERR 为正。除了胰腺,从 0-20mSv 和 5-500mSv 亚组中可以获得日本幸存者在 1945 年原子弹爆炸中受到的小于 20mSv 外照射的潜伏期和风险的相似估计值。1945 年遭受小于 20mSv 外照射的日本幸存者的癌症风险较大且显著,这对 ICRP 建议的年职业剂量限值提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/074117ed1d49/1476-069X-8-56-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/92f75740318b/1476-069X-8-56-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/ca94e939e0f7/1476-069X-8-56-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/074117ed1d49/1476-069X-8-56-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/92f75740318b/1476-069X-8-56-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/ca94e939e0f7/1476-069X-8-56-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb7/2799447/074117ed1d49/1476-069X-8-56-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Reanalysis of cancer mortality in Japanese A-bomb survivors exposed to low doses of radiation: bootstrap and simulation methods.日本原子弹幸存者低剂量辐射致癌死亡率的再分析:自举法和模拟方法。
Environ Health. 2009 Dec 9;8:56. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-56.
2
Low dose radiation and cancer in A-bomb survivors: latency and non-linear dose-response in the 1950-90 mortality cohort.原子弹爆炸幸存者中的低剂量辐射与癌症:1950 - 1990年死亡队列中的潜伏期和非线性剂量反应
Environ Health. 2007 Jan 18;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-1.
3
Independent analysis of the radiation risk for leukaemia in children and adults with mortality data (1950-2003) of Japanese A-bomb survivors.利用日本原子弹幸存者的死亡率数据(1950 - 2003年)对儿童和成人白血病的辐射风险进行独立分析。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2013 Mar;52(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s00411-012-0437-6. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
4
Multi-model inference of adult and childhood leukaemia excess relative risks based on the Japanese A-bomb survivors mortality data (1950-2000).基于日本原子弹幸存者死亡率数据(1950 - 2000年)的成人和儿童白血病超额相对风险的多模型推断
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2011 Mar;50(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s00411-010-0337-6. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Cancer Mortality through 2005 among a Pooled Cohort of U.S. Nuclear Workers Exposed to External Ionizing Radiation.截至2005年美国暴露于外照射电离辐射的核工业工作人员合并队列中的癌症死亡率。
Radiat Res. 2015 Jun;183(6):620-31. doi: 10.1667/RR13988.1. Epub 2015 May 26.
6
Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.日本原子弹幸存者中的癌症及非癌症影响。
J Radiol Prot. 2009 Jun;29(2A):A43-59. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S04. Epub 2009 May 19.
7
Low dose radiation risks for women surviving the a-bombs in Japan: generalized additive model.日本原子弹爆炸幸存者中女性的低剂量辐射风险:广义相加模型
Environ Health. 2016 Nov 24;15(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0191-3.
8
Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.原子弹爆炸幸存者寿命研究中的实体癌发病率:1958 - 2009年
Radiat Res. 2017 May;187(5):513-537. doi: 10.1667/RR14492.1. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
A reanalysis of curvature in the dose response for cancer and modifications by age at exposure following radiation therapy for benign disease.良性疾病放射治疗后,癌症剂量反应中曲率的再分析及受照年龄的修饰作用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 1;85(2):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
10
Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries.低剂量和低剂量率外照射电离辐射的影响:三个国家核工业工人的癌症死亡率
Radiat Res. 1995 May;142(2):117-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of stomach cancer incidence in a cohort of Mayak PA workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.Mayak 核电厂职业暴露于电离辐射工人队列的胃癌发病风险。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231531. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Low dose radiation and cancer in A-bomb survivors: latency and non-linear dose-response in the 1950-90 mortality cohort.原子弹爆炸幸存者中的低剂量辐射与癌症:1950 - 1990年死亡队列中的潜伏期和非线性剂量反应
Environ Health. 2007 Jan 18;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-1.
2
Cytogenetic effect of low dose gamma-radiation in Hordeum vulgare seedlings: non-linear dose-effect relationship.低剂量γ辐射对大麦幼苗的细胞遗传学效应:非线性剂量效应关系
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007 Mar;46(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00411-006-0082-z. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
3
Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.
当仅在备择假设下存在干扰参数时用于假设检验的最大统计量比较。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030531.x.
4
The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: II. A quantitative model.放射肿瘤发生中的旁观者效应:II. 一个定量模型。
Radiat Res. 2001 Mar;155(3):402-8. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0402:tbeiro]2.0.co;2.
5
Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.原子弹爆炸幸存者死亡率研究。第12号报告,第一部分。癌症:1950 - 1990年。
Radiat Res. 1996 Jul;146(1):1-27.
6
1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.国际放射防护委员会1990年建议
Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1-3):1-201.