Fontana Carla, Favaro Marco, Limongi Dolores, Pivonkova Jana, Favalli Cartesio
Department of Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
BMC Res Notes. 2009 Dec 10;2:244. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-244.
The first step in routine microbiology laboratory procedures is the collection and safe transportation of swab samples. This can be accomplished using ESwab Collection and Transport System (Copan Italia, Brescia -Italy). The aim of the present study was to compare the results of microscopic examination of gram stain smears prepared directly from clinical specimens, collected and transported in the ESwab, with those obtained using Amies Agar gel Transystem without charcoal (Copan).
Specimens were collected from 80 patients (32 vaginal swabs, 27 cervical swabs, 11 urethral swabs and 10 wound swabs). Two swabs were in random order collected from each patient, one using the conventional Amies gel Transystem, the other using ESwab. One slide was prepared for each specimen using the conventional swab and two sets of slides were prepared from the specimens collected with the ESwab: one using 100 mul and one using 50 mul of the Amies medium. All slides were gram stained using an automated Gram stainer. Microscopic examination of 240 slides (80 with conventional and 160 with ESwab) showed that the quality of smear preparation from the ESwab system, allowed for easier identification of human cells and identification of greater number of microorganisms. Microscopic examination of additional slides prepared from ESwab at 24 or 72 hours after initial collection were equivalent to those prepared when received in the laboratory within 2 hours of collection.
Microscopic examination performed using ESwab, especially when preparing the slides with 100 mul, shows superior results to those obtained using the Amies gel Transystem.
常规微生物学实验室操作的第一步是拭子样本的采集和安全运输。这可以使用ESwab采集和运输系统(意大利科潘公司,布雷西亚,意大利)来完成。本研究的目的是比较直接从临床标本中采集并通过ESwab运输的标本制备的革兰氏染色涂片的显微镜检查结果,与使用不含活性炭的阿米斯琼脂凝胶运输系统(科潘公司)获得的结果。
从80名患者身上采集标本(32份阴道拭子、27份宫颈拭子、11份尿道拭子和10份伤口拭子)。从每位患者身上随机采集两份拭子,一份使用传统的阿米斯凝胶运输系统,另一份使用ESwab。使用传统拭子为每个标本制备一张玻片,从用ESwab采集的标本中制备两组玻片:一组使用100微升阿米斯培养基,另一组使用50微升。所有玻片均使用自动革兰氏染色仪进行革兰氏染色。对240张玻片(80张使用传统方法制备,160张使用ESwab制备)进行显微镜检查,结果显示,ESwab系统制备的涂片质量更易于识别人类细胞,且能识别更多数量的微生物。对最初采集后24小时或72小时从ESwab制备的额外玻片进行显微镜检查,结果与采集后2小时内送达实验室时制备的玻片相当。
使用ESwab进行显微镜检查,尤其是在制备100微升玻片时,显示出比使用阿米斯凝胶运输系统更好的结果。