• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结直肠癌筛查:荷兰健康委员会的建议]

[Colorectal cancer screening: advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands].

作者信息

van Veen Wim, Mali Willem P Th M

机构信息

Gezondheidsraad, Den Haag, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A1441.

PMID:20003552
Abstract

There is sufficient evidence that a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme is feasible, acceptable and cost-effective amongst the Dutch population. This is the conclusion of the Health Council of the Netherlands in an advisory report to the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport. It also concluded that an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) would be the obvious screening method. The recommended target group is men and women aged 55-75. An evaluation of the randomized pilot trials in the regions of Nijmegen, Amsterdam, and Rotterdam predicted a participation rate of 60%. Based on the analyses from a microsimulation model, biennial screening for CRC with iFOBT and an uptake rate of 60% could prevent 1400 deaths from CRC per annum, at a cost of 2200 euros per years of life saved.

摘要

有充分证据表明,在荷兰人群中开展结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目是可行的、可接受的且具有成本效益。这是荷兰健康委员会在给卫生、福利和体育部部长的一份咨询报告中得出的结论。报告还得出结论,免疫化学粪便潜血试验(iFOBT)将是理想的筛查方法。推荐的目标群体是55至75岁的男性和女性。对奈梅亨、阿姆斯特丹和鹿特丹地区随机试点试验的评估预测参与率为60%。基于微观模拟模型的分析,采用iFOBT每两年进行一次CRC筛查且接受率为60%,每年可预防1400例CRC死亡,每挽救一年生命的成本为2200欧元。

相似文献

1
[Colorectal cancer screening: advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands].[结直肠癌筛查:荷兰健康委员会的建议]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A1441.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (KCIS 16).基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中免疫化学粪便潜血试验最佳临界值确定的成本效益分析(KCIS 16)
J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):191-9. doi: 10.1258/096914107782912022.
3
Potential impact of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada.加拿大基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的潜在影响。
Chronic Dis Can. 2003 Fall;24(4):81-8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in France using a guaiac test versus an immunochemical test.法国使用愈创木脂测试与免疫化学测试筛查结直肠癌的成本效益比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jan;26(1):40-7. doi: 10.1017/S026646230999078X.
5
[National colorectal carcinoma screening program deserves further study; a report from the Dutch Health Council].[荷兰卫生委员会报告:国家结直肠癌筛查计划值得进一步研究]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Aug 25;145(34):1655-7.
6
[Arguments against implementing a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer].[反对实施基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划的论据]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Aug 9;152(32):1777.
7
Screening for colorectal cancer: which test can we afford?结直肠癌筛查:我们负担得起哪种检测?
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;46 Suppl 1:S38-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963482.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France.法国两种结直肠癌大规模筛查策略的成本效益分析。
Health Econ. 2004 Mar;13(3):227-38. doi: 10.1002/hec.819.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
10
Limitations of the faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer.粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的局限性。
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Mar;31(2):119-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.自主和知情决策:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308. eCollection 2020.
2
Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查背景下的决策风格。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Feb 3;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-0381-1.
3
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在一般风险结直肠癌筛查人群中的性能。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1909-1918. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445.
4
Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?公众为何对结直肠癌筛查如此积极?
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6106-1.
5
The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?荷兰公众对结直肠癌筛查计划持积极态度,但这是一个明智的观点吗?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):1208. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7.
6
Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study.结直肠腺瘤切除术后对监测指南的依从性:一项基于社区的大型研究。
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1584-92. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306453. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):88-100. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr004. Epub 2011 Jun 1.