Suppr超能文献

高渗甘露醇对惊厥剂量梭曼中毒小鼠的治疗作用:无神经保护作用的抗致死活性。

Hypertonic mannitol in mice poisoned by a convulsive dose of soman: antilethal activity without neuroprotection.

机构信息

Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Centre de Recherches du Service de Santé des Armées, Département de Toxicologie, BP87, F-38702 La Tronche Cedex, France.

出版信息

Toxicology. 2010 Jan 31;268(1-2):78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

Abstract

A convulsive dose of soman induces seizure-related brain damage (SRBD), including cerebral edema (CE) and cell death. In 1993, an American study demonstrated that hypertonic mannitol (Mann) intravenously (i.v.) administered 1 min and 5h post-soman was an effective neuroprotectant in intoxicated rats. Using a similar protocol, we recently failed to reproduce this success in intoxicated mice. In the present study, also performed in mice, the persistence or the amplitude of the osmotic load was increased by reducing the time interval between two injections of Mann or by augmenting the number of injections. Mice were pre-treated with the oxime HI-6 and then intoxicated with a convulsive dose of soman (172 microg/kg). Afterward, they were administered a first i.v. bolus of Mann 20% 1 min post-challenge and a second one either 5, or 2, or 1h after. Additional animals were given either one (1 min post-soman), or two (1 min and 1h post-soman), or three (1 min, 1 and 2h post-soman) series of three injections of Mann at 5 min intervals. Non-intoxicated mice treated with Mann (same protocols as above) and intoxicated mice treated with Mann vehicle (saline) served as controls. At 24h post-intoxication, the survivors were sacrificed and their brains prepared for quantitative histological assessment of cell damage, CE, and ventricle size. Whatever the protocol, Mann had no effect on soman-induced convulsions but did provide considerable antilethal activity. Histologically, Mann did not reduce the cell damage or CE. It even showed a dose-dependent trend toward aggravation of SRBD in some regions and promoted subarachnoid hemorrhages. Conversely, in one of the treatment protocol, it reduced soman-induced enlargement of ventricle size. Although treatment with hypertonic Mann showed some benefit on mortality and ventricle size, it failed to be an effective neuroprotector in soman-intoxicated mice and even increased the detrimental impact of soman at the cerebral level. Therefore, no clear recommendation could be drawn from the present study in view of a possible clinical use of hyperosmolar treatment in the medical management of soman poisoning.

摘要

梭曼引起的惊厥剂量会导致与癫痫相关的脑损伤(SRBD),包括脑水肿(CE)和细胞死亡。1993 年,一项美国研究表明,在中毒的大鼠中,静脉注射高渗甘露醇(Mann)1 分钟和梭曼中毒后 5 小时是一种有效的神经保护剂。使用类似的方案,我们最近未能在中毒的小鼠中重现这一成功。在本研究中,同样在小鼠中进行,通过减少 Mann 两次注射之间的时间间隔或增加注射次数,增加了渗透负荷的持续时间或幅度。小鼠先用肟类 HI-6 预处理,然后用惊厥剂量的梭曼(172μg/kg)中毒。之后,它们在挑战后 1 分钟静脉注射 Mann 20%的第一剂,然后在 5、2 或 1 小时后再注射第二剂。其他动物分别在 1 分钟(梭曼中毒后)、1 分钟和 1 小时(梭曼中毒后)或 1 分钟、1 小时和 2 小时(梭曼中毒后)三个时间段以 5 分钟的间隔接受三剂 Mann。未中毒的用 Mann 治疗的小鼠(与上述相同的方案)和用 Mann 载体(盐水)中毒的小鼠作为对照。在中毒后 24 小时,幸存者被处死,其大脑用于定量组织学评估细胞损伤、CE 和脑室大小。无论采用何种方案,Mann 都不能影响梭曼引起的惊厥,但确实提供了相当大的抗致死活性。组织学上,Mann 并未减少细胞损伤或 CE。它甚至在某些区域显示出与剂量相关的加重 SRBD 的趋势,并促进蛛网膜下腔出血。相反,在一种治疗方案中,它减少了梭曼引起的脑室大小增大。尽管高渗 Mann 治疗在死亡率和脑室大小方面显示出一些益处,但它不能成为梭曼中毒小鼠的有效神经保护剂,甚至在大脑水平上增加了梭曼的有害影响。因此,鉴于高渗治疗在梭曼中毒的医学管理中可能的临床应用,目前的研究无法得出明确的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验