Suppr超能文献

测试决策辅助工具是否引入认知偏差:一项随机试验的结果。

Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial.

机构信息

VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Women at high risk of breast cancer face a difficult decision whether to take medications like tamoxifen to prevent a first breast cancer diagnosis. Decision aids (DAs) offer a promising method of helping them make this decision. But concern lingers that DAs might introduce cognitive biases.

METHODS

We recruited 663 women at high risk of breast cancer and presented them with a DA designed to experimentally test potential methods of identifying and reducing cognitive biases that could influence this decision, by varying specific aspects of the DA across participants in a factorial design.

RESULTS

Participants were susceptible to a cognitive bias - an order effect - such that those who learned first about the risks of tamoxifen thought more favorably of the drug than women who learned first about the benefits. This order effect was eliminated among women who received additional information about competing health risks.

CONCLUSION

We discovered that the order of risk/benefit information influenced women's perceptions of tamoxifen. This bias was eliminated by providing contextual information about competing health risks.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

We have demonstrated the feasibility of using factorial experimental designs to test whether DAs introduce cognitive biases, and whether specific elements of DAs can reduce such biases.

摘要

目的

患有乳腺癌高风险的女性面临着一个艰难的决策,即是否服用他莫昔芬等药物来预防首次乳腺癌诊断。决策辅助工具(DA)为帮助她们做出这一决策提供了一种很有前途的方法。但人们仍然担心 DA 可能会引入认知偏差。

方法

我们招募了 663 名患有乳腺癌高风险的女性,并向她们展示了一种 DA,旨在通过在参与者中采用因子设计来实验性地测试潜在的识别和减少可能影响这一决策的认知偏差的方法,具体方法是改变 DA 的特定方面。

结果

参与者易受认知偏差的影响,即顺序效应,即那些首先了解他莫昔芬风险的人比首先了解其益处的人对该药物的评价更高。对于那些收到关于竞争健康风险的额外信息的女性,这种顺序效应被消除了。

结论

我们发现风险/收益信息的顺序会影响女性对他莫昔芬的看法。通过提供关于竞争健康风险的背景信息,可以消除这种偏见。

实践意义

我们已经证明了使用因子实验设计来测试 DA 是否会引入认知偏差,以及 DA 的特定元素是否可以减少这种偏差的可行性。

相似文献

1
Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
2
Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;119(3):613-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0618-4.
3
4
Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):681-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1450-1. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
8
How should we inform women at higher risk of breast cancer about tamoxifen? An approach with a decision guide.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Nov;94(2):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-6932-6.
9
Effects of tamoxifen and raloxifene on memory and other cognitive abilities: cognition in the study of tamoxifen and raloxifene.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5144-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0716. Epub 2009 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Care Physicians' Perspectives on Nudging in Communication.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2531199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31199.
3
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 1: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255333. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255333. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
5
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255337. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255337. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
6
Debiasing Judgements Using a Distributed Cognition Approach: A Scoping Review of Technological Strategies.
Hum Factors. 2025 Jun;67(6):525-545. doi: 10.1177/00187208241292897. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
7
Poor Consumer Comprehension and Plan Selection Inconsistencies Under the 2016 HealthCare.gov Choice Architecture.
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jan-Jun;2(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468317716441. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Subjective Numeracy and the Influence of Order and Amount of Audible Information on Perceived Medication Value.
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):230-238. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16650665. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
9
Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(0):S3-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122239. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Screening experiments and the use of fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1354-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127563. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):609-18. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306780. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
6
Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make "good" decisions.
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V39-44. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023954.85887.69.
7
Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):67-80. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024212.
8
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.
9
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验