• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

作者信息

Tversky A, Kahneman D

出版信息

Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.

DOI:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
PMID:17835457
Abstract

This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.

摘要

本文描述了在不确定性情况下进行判断时所采用的三种启发法

(i)代表性,通常在人们被要求判断物体或事件A属于类别或过程B的概率时使用;(ii)实例或情景的可获得性,通常在人们被要求评估某一类别出现的频率或特定发展的合理性时使用;(iii)从锚点进行调整,通常在有相关值时用于数值预测。这些启发法非常经济且通常有效,但它们会导致系统性的和可预测的错误。更好地理解这些启发法及其导致的偏差,可能会改善在不确定性情况下的判断和决策。

相似文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.不安全的性行为:决策偏差与启发法
AIDS Educ Prev. 1993 Winter;5(4):294-301.
3
Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics.概率心理模型理论及快速节俭启发式的心理学合理性
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;115(1):199-213. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.199.
4
Smart strategies for doctors and doctors-in-training: heuristics in medicine.医生和医学生的明智策略:医学中的启发式方法。
Med Educ. 2009 Aug;43(8):721-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03359.x. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
5
Enhancing Analytical Reasoning in the Intensive Care Unit.加强重症监护病房的分析推理能力。
Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jan;38(1):51-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.09.001.
6
The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in decision making: judgment under uncertainty or judgment per se?腹内侧前额叶皮质在决策中的作用:不确定性下的判断还是判断本身?
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Nov;17(11):2669-74. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl176. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
7
How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.如何解释对合取谬误抑制训练的接受度:来自爱荷华赌博任务的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Apr;72(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
8
Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.量化启发式偏差:锚定、可得性和代表性。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):67-75. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1332631. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
9
Perspective: Uses and misuses of thresholds in diagnostic decision making.观点:诊断决策中阈值的使用与误用。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):556-63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd59b.
10
The hazards of underspecified models: the case of symmetry in everyday predictions.未充分指定模型的危害:日常预测中的对称性案例。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):770-80. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.770.

引用本文的文献

1
Weaponizing cognitive bias in autonomous systems: a framework for black-box inference attacks.在自主系统中利用认知偏差:黑箱推理攻击框架
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Aug 20;8:1623573. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1623573. eCollection 2025.
2
Catecholamines reduce choice history biases in perceptual decision making.儿茶酚胺可减少知觉决策中的选择历史偏差。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Sep 3;23(9):e3003361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003361. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Behavioral Economic Framing for Enrollment and Retention of Patients in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
用于远程血压监测患者招募与留存的行为经济学框架:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2529825. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29825.
4
The dark side of close-ties communities: How strong social connections shape health-related risk perceptions.紧密联系社区的阴暗面:强大的社会关系如何塑造与健康相关的风险认知。
Environ Hazards. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2024.2445002.
5
The evolution of discrimination under finite memory constraints.有限记忆约束下歧视的演变。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 28;15(1):31774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17089-9.
6
The effect of centrality bias on triage nurses in the emergency department.中心性偏差对急诊科分诊护士的影响。
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Aug 23;13:20503121251364742. doi: 10.1177/20503121251364742. eCollection 2025.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational approaches to reduce cognitive biases among students.减少学生认知偏差的教育方法的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02253-y.
8
Cognitive biases as Bayesian probability weighting in context.认知偏差作为情境中的贝叶斯概率加权。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1572168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572168. eCollection 2025.
9
Evaluating the o1 reasoning large language model for cognitive bias: a vignette study.评估用于认知偏差的o1推理大语言模型:一项 vignette 研究。
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 21;29(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05591-5.
10
What social stratifications in bias blind spot can tell us about implicit social bias in both LLMs and humans.偏见盲点中的社会分层能告诉我们关于大语言模型和人类的隐性社会偏见的哪些信息。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14875-3.