Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Cell. 2009 Dec 11;139(6):1189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.004.
We have shown previously that the loss of abdominal pigmentation in D. santomea relative to its sister species D. yakuba resulted, in part, from cis-regulatory mutations at the tan locus. Matute et al. claim, based solely upon extrapolation from genetic crosses of D. santomea and D. melanogaster, a much more divergent species, that at least four X chromosome regions but not tan are responsible for pigmentation differences. Here, we provide additional evidence from introgressions of D. yakuba genes into D. santomea that support a causative role for tan in the loss of pigmentation and present analyses that contradict Matute et al.'s claims. We discuss how the choice of parental species and other factors affect the ability to identify loci responsible for species divergence, and we affirm that all of our previously reported results and conclusions stand.
我们之前已经表明,相对于其姐妹种 D. yakuba,D. santomea 的腹部色素沉着丧失部分是由于 tan 基因座的顺式调控突变所致。Matute 等人仅基于 D. santomea 和遗传杂交的推断与 D. melanogaster 进行推断,这是一个差异更大的物种,他们声称至少有四个 X 染色体区域而非 tan 负责色素沉着差异。在这里,我们从 D. yakuba 基因导入 D. santomea 的基因渐渗中提供了更多证据,支持 tan 在色素沉着丧失中的因果作用,并提供了与 Matute 等人的主张相矛盾的分析。我们讨论了选择亲本物种和其他因素如何影响识别导致物种分化的基因座的能力,并确认我们之前报告的所有结果和结论仍然成立。