Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, J.W. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2010 Mar;81(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is considered to be the gold standard of prehospital airway management. However, ETI requires substantial technical skills and ongoing experience. Because failed prehospital ETI is common and associated with a higher mortality, reliable airway devices are needed to be used by rescuers less experienced in ETI. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility of laryngeal tubes used by paramedics and emergency physicians for out-of-hospital airway management.
During a 24-month period, all cases of prehospital use of the laryngeal tube disposable (LT-D) and laryngeal tube suction disposable (LTS-D) within five operational areas of emergency medical services were recorded by a standardised questionnaire. We determined indications for laryngeal tube use, placement success, number of placement attempts, placement time and personal level of experience.
Of 157 prehospital intubation attempts with the LT-D/LTS-D, 152 (96.8%) were successfully performed by paramedics (n=70) or emergency physicians (n=87). The device was used as initial airway (n=87) or rescue device after failed ETI (n=70). The placement time was < or =45s (n=120), 46-90s (n=20) and >90s (n=7). In five cases the time needed was not specified. The number of placement attempts was one (n=123), two (n=25), three (n=2) and more than three (n=2). The majority of users (61.1%) were relative novices with no more than five previous laryngeal tube placements.
The LT-D/LTS-D represents a reliable tool for prehospital airway management in the hands of both paramedics and emergency physicians. It can be used as an initial tool to secure the airway until ETI is prepared, as a definitive airway by rescuers less experienced with ETI or as a rescue device when ETI has failed.
气管插管(ETI)被认为是院前气道管理的金标准。然而,ETI 需要大量的技术技能和持续的经验。由于院前 ETI 失败很常见,且与死亡率升高相关,因此需要可靠的气道设备,以便经验不足的急救人员使用。我们前瞻性评估了急救人员和急诊医师在院外气道管理中使用一次性喉管(LT-D)和一次性喉管吸引器(LTS-D)的可行性。
在 24 个月的时间里,通过标准化问卷记录了在五个紧急医疗服务运营区域内院前使用一次性喉管(LT-D)和一次性喉管吸引器(LTS-D)的所有病例。我们确定了使用喉管的指征、放置成功率、放置尝试次数、放置时间和个人经验水平。
在 157 次 LT-D/LTS-D 院前插管尝试中,152 次(96.8%)由急救人员(n=70)或急诊医师(n=87)成功完成。该设备被用作初始气道(n=87)或 ETI 失败后的抢救设备(n=70)。放置时间<或=45s(n=120)、46-90s(n=20)和>90s(n=7)。在 5 例中,未指定所需时间。放置尝试次数为 1 次(n=123)、2 次(n=25)、3 次(n=2)和 3 次以上(n=2)。大多数使用者(61.1%)是相对新手,之前进行过不超过 5 次的喉管放置。
LT-D/LTS-D 是急救人员和急诊医师进行院前气道管理的可靠工具。它可以作为准备 ETI 期间的初始工具,作为经验不足的急救人员的确定性气道,或作为 ETI 失败时的抢救设备。