Suppr超能文献

急救人员使用七种不同气道设备进行插管的性能和技能保持情况——一项人体模型研究。

Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the most widespread method for emergency airway management. Several studies reported that ETI requires considerable skill and experience and if performed incorrectly, may result in serious adverse events. Unrecognized tube misplacement or oesophageal intubation is associated with high prehospital morbidity. This study investigates the usability of supraglottic airway devices compared to ETI and the skill retention of 41 previously inexperienced paramedics following training using a manikin model.

METHODS

41 paramedics participated in this study. None had prior experience in airway management, apart from bag-valve ventilation. After a standardised audio-visual lecture lasting 45min, the paramedics participated in a practical demonstration using the advanced patient simulator SimMan(®) (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Afterwards, paramedics were instructed to perform airway-management using seven different techniques to secure the airway (ETI, Laryngeal mask unique [LMA], Proseal, Laryngeal tube disposable [LT-D(®)], I-Gel(®), Combitube(®), and EasyTube(®)) following a randomized sequence. Participants underwent reassessment after 3 months without any further training or practice in airway-management.

RESULTS

During the initial training session, ETI was successfully performed in 78% of cases, while 3 months later the success rate was 58%. For the supraglottic airway devices, five out of six were successfully used by all paramedics at both time points, the exception being Proseal(®). Our data show successful skill retention (success rate: 100%) after 3 months for five out of six supraglottic airway devices. Time to ventilation (T3) was significantly less for LMA, LT-D(®) and I-Gel(®) at all time points compared to ETI.

CONCLUSION

ETI performed by inexperienced paramedics is associated with a low success rate. In contrast, supraglottic airway devices like LMA, LT-D(®), I-Gel(®), Combitube(®) and EasyTube(®) are fast, safe and easy-to-use. Within the limitations of a manikin-study, this study suggests that inexperienced medical staff might benefit from using supraglottic airway devices for emergency airway management.

摘要

简介

气管插管(ETI)是最广泛的紧急气道管理方法。有几项研究报告称,ETI 需要相当的技能和经验,如果操作不当,可能会导致严重的不良事件。未被识别的气管导管位置不当或食管插管与高院前发病率有关。本研究调查了与 ETI 相比,使用声门上气道装置的可用性,以及 41 名以前没有气道管理经验的护理人员在使用人体模型进行培训后的技能保留情况。

方法

41 名护理人员参与了这项研究。除了球囊-面罩通气外,他们都没有气道管理方面的经验。在持续 45 分钟的标准视听讲座后,护理人员使用高级患者模拟器 SimMan®(Laerdal Medical,斯塔万格,挪威)进行了实际演示。之后,护理人员被指导使用七种不同的技术来通过气道(ETI、喉罩独特型[LMA]、Proseal、一次性喉管[LT-D®]、I-Gel®、Combitube®和 EasyTube®)来确保气道通畅,采用随机顺序进行。参与者在 3 个月后没有接受任何进一步的气道管理培训或实践后接受重新评估。

结果

在初始培训课程中,78%的病例成功进行了 ETI,而 3 个月后成功率为 58%。对于声门上气道装置,所有护理人员在两个时间点都成功使用了其中的六种,除了 Proseal®。我们的数据显示,在 3 个月后,除了 Proseal®,五种声门上气道装置中的五种都成功保留了技能(成功率:100%)。在所有时间点,与 ETI 相比,LMA、LT-D®和 I-Gel®的通气时间(T3)都显著缩短。

结论

经验不足的护理人员进行 ETI 的成功率较低。相比之下,LMA、LT-D®、I-Gel®、Combitube®和 EasyTube®等声门上气道装置快速、安全且易于使用。在人体模型研究的限制范围内,本研究表明,经验不足的医务人员可能受益于使用声门上气道装置进行紧急气道管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验