Suppr超能文献

评估精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍或双相情感障碍患者的静坐不能:来自短期和长期阿立哌唑试验的汇总数据的事后分析。

Evaluation of akathisia in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of pooled data from short- and long-term aripiprazole trials.

机构信息

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1019-29. doi: 10.1177/0269881109348157. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to assess the clinical characteristics of akathisia in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder receiving aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, or placebo. We conducted post hoc analyses of pooled safety data from trials in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar I disorder. Outcome measures included the incidence of akathisia, time to onset, duration, severity, and discontinuation due to akathisia, concomitant use of benzodiazepines and/or anticholinergics, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) scores, and the correlation between antipsychotic efficacy and akathisia. The results for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were as follows: akathisia in 9% of aripiprazole- and 6% of placebo-treated patients; 12.5% of aripiprazole- versus 24% of haloperidol-treated patients; 11% of aripiprazole- versus 6% of olanzapine-treated patients. Bipolar I disorder: akathisia in 18% of aripiprazole- and 5% of placebo-treated patients. The clinical characteristics of akathisia were similar between each data set, regardless of disease. Akathisia was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Discontinuation due to akathisia was low in both the schizophrenia trials (aripiprazole 0.3%; placebo 0%; aripiprazole 0.9%; haloperidol 2.3%; aripiprazole 1.2%; olanzapine 0.2%) and the bipolar trials (aripiprazole 2.3%; placebo 0%). Treatment-emergent akathisia was not associated with a poorer clinical response. In conclusion, akathisia with aripiprazole occurred early in treatment, was mild-to-moderate in severity, led to few study discontinuations, and did not compromise therapeutic efficacy.

摘要

本文旨在评估接受阿立哌唑、氟哌啶醇、奥氮平或安慰剂治疗的精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍或双相 I 型障碍患者的静坐不能临床特征。我们对精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍和双相 I 型障碍患者试验的汇总安全性数据进行了事后分析。结局指标包括静坐不能的发生率、发病时间、持续时间、严重程度和因静坐不能而停药、苯二氮䓬类药物和/或抗胆碱能药物的同时使用、巴恩斯静坐不能评定量表(BARS)评分,以及抗精神病药物疗效与静坐不能之间的相关性。精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍的结果如下:阿立哌唑治疗组 9%和安慰剂治疗组 6%出现静坐不能;阿立哌唑治疗组 12.5%和氟哌啶醇治疗组 24%出现静坐不能;阿立哌唑治疗组 11%和奥氮平治疗组 6%出现静坐不能。双相 I 型障碍:阿立哌唑治疗组 18%和安慰剂治疗组 5%出现静坐不能。无论疾病如何,静坐不能的临床特征在每个数据集之间均相似。静坐不能的严重程度通常为轻度至中度。精神分裂症试验中因静坐不能而停药的比例均较低(阿立哌唑组 0.3%;安慰剂组 0%;阿立哌唑组 0.9%;氟哌啶醇组 2.3%;阿立哌唑组 1.2%;奥氮平组 0.2%),双相试验中也较低(阿立哌唑组 2.3%;安慰剂组 0%)。治疗引起的静坐不能与较差的临床反应无关。总之,阿立哌唑治疗引起的静坐不能发生在治疗早期,程度为轻度至中度,导致的研究停药病例较少,且不会影响治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验