Fowke Jay H
Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 34203-1783, USA.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Nov;42(6):343-8. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.6.343.
The final decision of study design in molecular and genetic epidemiology is usually a compromise between the research study aims and a number of logistical and ethical barriers that may limit the feasibility of the study or the interpretation of results. Although biomarker measurements may improve exposure or disease assessments, it is necessary to address the possibility that biomarker measurement inserts additional sources of misclassification and confounding that may lead to inconsistencies across the research literature. Studies targeting multi-causal diseases and investigating gene-environment interactions must not only meet the needs of a traditional epidemiologic study but also the needs of the biomarker investigation. This paper is intended to highlight the major issues that need to be considered when developing an epidemiologic study utilizing biomarkers. These issues covers from molecular and genetic epidemiology (MGE) study designs including cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical trials, nested case-control, and case-only studies to matching the study design to the MGE research goals. This review summarizes logistical barriers and the most common epidemiological study designs most relevant to MGE and describes the strengths and limitations of each approach in the context of common MGE research aims to meet specific MEG objectives.
分子与遗传流行病学研究设计的最终决策通常是在研究目标与一些后勤和伦理障碍之间进行权衡,这些障碍可能会限制研究的可行性或结果的解释。尽管生物标志物测量可能会改善暴露或疾病评估,但有必要考虑生物标志物测量可能会引入额外的错误分类和混杂因素,从而导致研究文献之间出现不一致的可能性。针对多病因疾病并研究基因-环境相互作用的研究不仅要满足传统流行病学研究的需求,还要满足生物标志物研究的需求。本文旨在强调在开展利用生物标志物的流行病学研究时需要考虑的主要问题。这些问题涵盖从分子与遗传流行病学(MGE)研究设计,包括横断面研究、队列研究、病例对照研究、临床试验、巢式病例对照研究和病例单组研究,到使研究设计与MGE研究目标相匹配。本综述总结了后勤障碍以及与MGE最相关的最常见流行病学研究设计,并在常见的MGE研究目标以满足特定MEG目标的背景下描述了每种方法的优缺点。