Accreditation and Quality Improvement, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Washington, District of Columbia 20036, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):67-71. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c2c7f7.
To understand what tools, resources, and assistance are needed for local health departments (LHDs) to successfully engage in quality improvement (QI) and to generate examples of successful QI efforts.
With funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Association of County & City Health Officials supported 66 LHD demonstration sites between 2007 and 2009. The sites measured themselves against national standards and addressed priority areas for improvement through the application of QI techniques. We used on-line surveys, interviews, and informal collection of participant feedback to determine the usefulness of resources that were provided for QI efforts.
Participating LHDs lack a common understanding of formal QI. Several existing QI resources specifically geared to public health are very useful, and in-person assistance is highly valued.
The value of Web-based sessions is uncertain, and state and national meetings could provide accessible forums for in-person training. Dedicated time to training and implementation, coupled with widespread sharing of best practices and success stories, could enhance the uptake of QI efforts in LHDs. Additional studies regarding sustainability are needed to understand how to institutionalize QI.
了解地方卫生部门(LHD)成功开展质量改进(QI)所需的工具、资源和援助,并举例说明成功的 QI 努力。
在疾病控制和预防中心以及罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会的资助下,全国县和城市卫生官员协会在 2007 年至 2009 年间支持了 66 个 LHD 示范基地。这些基地根据国家标准衡量自身水平,并通过应用 QI 技术来解决优先改进领域的问题。我们通过在线调查、访谈和非正式收集参与者的反馈来确定为 QI 工作提供的资源的有用性。
参与的 LHD 对正式的 QI 缺乏共同的理解。有几个专门针对公共卫生的现有 QI 资源非常有用,并且非常重视面对面的帮助。
基于网络的会议的价值是不确定的,州和国家会议可以为面对面培训提供可访问的论坛。专门用于培训和实施的时间,以及广泛分享最佳实践和成功案例,可以提高 LHD 对 QI 工作的接受程度。需要进一步研究可持续性问题,以了解如何将 QI 制度化。