Gonzalez Richard P, Cummings Glenn R, Phelan Herbert A, Bosarge Patrick L, Rodning Charles B
Department of Surgery, Center for the Study of Rural Vehicular Trauma, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36617-2293, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1297-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b604.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a protocol that assesses the efficacy and sensitivity of clinical examination in complement with computed tomographic (CT) scan in screening for cervical spine (c-spine) injury.
During the 26-month period from March 2005 to May 2007, blunt trauma patients older than 13 years were prospectively entered into a study protocol. If patients were awake and alert with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) >or=14, clinical examination of the neck was performed. Clinical examination was performed regardless of distracting injuries. If the patient had no complaints of pain or tenderness, the cervical collar was removed. Patients with complaints of c-spine pain or tenderness and patients with GCS score <14 underwent CT scanning for evaluation of the entire c-spine.
One thousand six hundred eighty seven patients were prospectively assessed for blunt c-spine injury. Fourteen hundred thirty-nine patients had GCS score >or=14, 897 (62%) of which had a negative clinical examination of the c-spine and subsequently had cervical collars removed. Two patients (0.2%) whose clinical examination results disclosed nothing abnormal were later found to have a c-spine injury. Five hundred forty-two patients with GCS score >or=14 had a positive c-spine clinical examination, of which 134 (24%) were diagnosed with c-spine injury. One hundred thirty-three (99%) c-spine injuries were identified by CT scan. The c-spine injury missed by CT scan was a radiologic misinterpretation. For patients with c-spine injury with GCS score >or=14, both sensitivities of clinical examination and CT scan were 99%. Two hundred forty-eight patients had GCS score <14, of which 5 (2.0%) were diagnosed with c-spine injury. CT scan identified all c-spine injuries for patients with GCS score <14.
In awake and alert blunt trauma patients, clinical examination is a sensitive screening method for c-spine injury. Clinical examination allows for the majority of blunt trauma patients to have their c-spines cleared safely without radiologic screening. Clinical examination in complement with CT scan is a sensitive and an effective method for identification of c-spine injury in awake and alert patients with symptoms of c-spine injury. CT scan is the sensitive and effective test for screening and diagnosis of c-spine injury in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
本研究的目的是前瞻性评估一种方案,该方案评估临床检查结合计算机断层扫描(CT)在筛查颈椎损伤方面的有效性和敏感性。
在2005年3月至2007年5月的26个月期间,将13岁以上的钝性创伤患者前瞻性纳入研究方案。如果患者清醒且格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)≥14,则对颈部进行临床检查。无论是否存在分散注意力的损伤,均进行临床检查。如果患者没有疼痛或压痛主诉,则去除颈托。有颈椎疼痛或压痛主诉的患者以及GCS评分<14的患者接受CT扫描以评估整个颈椎。
前瞻性评估了1687例钝性颈椎损伤患者。1439例患者GCS评分≥14,其中897例(62%)颈椎临床检查结果为阴性,随后去除了颈托。2例(0.2%)临床检查结果无异常的患者后来被发现有颈椎损伤。542例GCS评分≥14的患者颈椎临床检查结果为阳性,其中134例(24%)被诊断为颈椎损伤。CT扫描发现了133例(99%)颈椎损伤。CT扫描漏诊的颈椎损伤是影像学误判。对于GCS评分≥14的颈椎损伤患者,临床检查和CT扫描的敏感性均为99%。248例患者GCS评分<14,其中5例(2.0%)被诊断为颈椎损伤。CT扫描发现了所有GCS评分<14患者的颈椎损伤。
在清醒且警觉的钝性创伤患者中,临床检查是筛查颈椎损伤的一种敏感方法。临床检查使大多数钝性创伤患者无需影像学筛查即可安全地排除颈椎损伤。临床检查结合CT扫描是识别有颈椎损伤症状的清醒且警觉患者颈椎损伤的一种敏感且有效的方法。CT扫描是筛查和诊断精神状态改变的钝性创伤患者颈椎损伤的敏感且有效检查。