Griffen Margaret M, Frykberg Eric R, Kerwin Andrew J, Schinco Miren A, Tepas Joseph J, Rowe Kathleen, Abboud Jennifer
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, 32209, USA.
J Trauma. 2003 Aug;55(2):222-6; discussion 226-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000083332.93868.E2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the roles of cervical spine radiographs (CSR) and computed tomography of the cervical spine (CTC) in the exclusion of cervical spine injury for adult blunt trauma patients.
At the authors' institution, all adult blunt trauma patients with physical findings of posterior midline neck tenderness, altered mental status, or neurologic deficit are considered at risk of cervical spine injury and undergo both CSR and CTC for evaluation of the cervical spine. The TRACS database at level 1 of the trauma center at this institution was queried for all blunt trauma patients from November 2000 to October 2001. Patient injury severity score (ISS), Glascow Coma Score (GCS), age, gender, CSR results, CTC results, and treatment data were analyzed.
The review included 3,018 blunt trauma patients with appropriate data. For 1,199 of these patients (779 men and 420 women) (40%) at risk for cervical spine injury, both CSR and CTC were performed for cervical spine evaluation. The average age of these patients was 39.4 years (range, 18-89 years). The average GCS was 13 and the average ISS was 8.4 in this study population. In 116 (9.5%) of these patients, a cervical spine injury (fracture or subluxation) was detected. The injury was identified on both CSR and CTC in 75 of these patients. In the remaining 41 patients (3.2%), the CSR results were negative, but injury was detected by CTC. All these injuries missed by CSR required treatment. For this group with false-negative CSR, the average GCS was 12 and the average ISS was 14.6. There were no missed cervical spine injuries among the patients with negative CTC results.
No identifiable factors predicted false-negative CSR. There does not appear to be any role for CSR screening in this setting. The data from this study add to the growing body of evidence that CTC should replace CSR for the evaluation of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.
本研究旨在评估颈椎X线片(CSR)和颈椎计算机断层扫描(CTC)在排除成年钝性创伤患者颈椎损伤中的作用。
在作者所在机构,所有有后正中颈部压痛、精神状态改变或神经功能缺损等体格检查结果的成年钝性创伤患者均被视为有颈椎损伤风险,并接受CSR和CTC检查以评估颈椎。查询该机构创伤中心1级的TRACS数据库中2000年11月至2001年10月期间的所有钝性创伤患者。分析患者损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、年龄、性别、CSR结果、CTC结果和治疗数据。
该回顾纳入了3018例有适当数据的钝性创伤患者。其中1199例(779例男性和420例女性)(40%)有颈椎损伤风险的患者接受了CSR和CTC检查以评估颈椎。这些患者的平均年龄为39.4岁(范围18 - 89岁)。本研究人群的平均GCS为13分,平均ISS为8.4分。在这些患者中,有116例(9.5%)检测到颈椎损伤(骨折或半脱位)。其中75例患者的损伤在CSR和CTC上均被识别。在其余41例患者(3.2%)中,CSR结果为阴性,但通过CTC检测到损伤。所有这些被CSR漏诊的损伤均需要治疗。对于这组CSR假阴性的患者,平均GCS为12分,平均ISS为14.6分。CTC结果为阴性的患者中没有漏诊颈椎损伤。
没有可识别的因素能预测CSR假阴性。在这种情况下,CSR筛查似乎没有任何作用。本研究的数据进一步证明,在钝性创伤中评估颈椎时,CTC应取代CSR。