• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知访谈技术揭示了可能影响患者对医院满意度的具体行为和问题。

Cognitive interview techniques reveal specific behaviors and issues that could affect patient satisfaction relative to hospitalists.

机构信息

Binghamton University, East Binghamton, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):E1-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.524.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.524
PMID:20013862
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a trend toward patient-centered care as a means of improving patient satisfaction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have made this concept more significant with plans to link reimbursement to patient satisfaction measures such as the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (HCAHPS).

OBJECTIVES

To generate hypotheses for reasons underlying diminished HCAHPS patient satisfaction survey ratings, with reference to hospitalists.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Observational study conducted using a cognitive interview (CI) technique in a 180-bed community hospital on adult medical, surgical, and critical care inpatients.

MEASUREMENTS

Mixed qualitative and quantitative study using both standard responses and open-ended responses. The standard responses were compiled into raw numbers and percentages and the qualitative responses were evaluated for common themes and other useful information.

RESULTS

Notable factors that may affect satisfaction of patients include ability to have all of their questions answered, incomplete discussion of medication side effects, and failure of physicians to listen and form personal connections with them.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive interview techniques can be used to provide additional detail regarding patient satisfaction beyond that provided by standard surveys.

摘要

背景

以改善患者满意度为手段的以患者为中心的护理模式是一种趋势。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)通过计划将报销与患者满意度措施(如医疗机构患者评估调查(HCAHPS))联系起来,使这一概念更加重要。

目的

针对医院医生,提出导致 HCAHPS 患者满意度调查评分下降的原因假设。

设计、地点、患者:在一家拥有 180 张病床的社区医院,对成人内科、外科和重症监护住院患者进行了一项基于认知访谈(CI)技术的观察性研究。

测量

使用标准回答和开放式回答的混合定性和定量研究。标准回答被编制成原始数字和百分比,而定性回答则评估了常见主题和其他有用信息。

结果

可能影响患者满意度的显著因素包括能够回答他们所有的问题、药物副作用讨论不完整以及医生未能倾听并与他们建立个人联系。

结论

认知访谈技术可用于提供超出标准调查提供的有关患者满意度的更多详细信息。

相似文献

1
Cognitive interview techniques reveal specific behaviors and issues that could affect patient satisfaction relative to hospitalists.认知访谈技术揭示了可能影响患者对医院满意度的具体行为和问题。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):E1-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.524.
2
Who's behind an HCAHPS score?医院患者医疗服务满意度调查(HCAHPS)评分背后是谁?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Oct;37(10):461-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37059-6.
3
Impact of hospitalist communication-skills training on patient-satisfaction scores.医院医师沟通技巧培训对患者满意度评分的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jun;8(6):315-20. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2041. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
4
Hospital-acquired conditions after orthopedic surgery do not affect patient satisfaction scores.骨科手术后的医院获得性疾病不影响患者满意度评分。
J Healthc Qual. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):33-40. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12031. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
5
Patient satisfaction with hospital care provided by hospitalists and primary care physicians.患者对医院内科医生和初级保健医生提供的医院护理的满意度。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Feb;7(2):131-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.973. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
6
Impact of Hospitalist Team Structure on Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Physician Performance.医院医生团队结构对患者报告的医生绩效满意度的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2668-2674. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05775-5. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
7
Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: a mixed methods study.理解医院服务变革期间的沟通:一项混合方法研究。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):535-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.523.
8
A Qualitative Exploration to Understand Hospitalists' Attitude Toward the Patient Experience Scoring System.一项旨在了解住院医师对患者体验评分系统态度的定性研究
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1036-1043. doi: 10.1177/2374373520942418. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
Assessing patient perceptions of hospitalist communication skills using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT).使用沟通评估工具(CAT)评估患者对医院医生沟通技巧的看法。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(9):522-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.787.
10
The Effects of Hospital-Level Factors on Patients' Ratings of Physician Communication.医院层面因素对患者对医生沟通评价的影响
J Healthc Manag. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):28-41.