• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解医院服务变革期间的沟通:一项混合方法研究。

Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):535-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.523.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.523
PMID:20013853
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little data exist to inform hospitalist communication during service changes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize hospitalist handoffs during service changes.

DESIGN

Serial survey study.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

MEASUREMENTS

From May to December 2007, 60 service changes among 17 hospitalists on a nonteaching service were targeted for evaluation using an anonymous 18-item survey that was completed by hospitalists within 48 hours of assuming care for patients. Survey items assessed completeness of handoff communication, certainty of patient care plans, missed information, time spent recovering information, and near misses/adverse events due to incomplete handoffs. The association between completeness of communication and handoff outcomes was examined. Narrative comments were analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent (56/60) of surveys were returned. All 17 hospitalists participated. Thirteen percent of respondents reported incomplete handoffs and 18% were uncertain of care plan on transition day. At least 1 near miss, attributable to incomplete communication was reported by 16%. Hospitalists who reported incomplete handoffs were more likely to report uncertainty about patient care plans on the transition day (71% incomplete vs. 10% complete, P < 0.01), discovery of missing information (71% incomplete vs. 24% complete, P = 0.01), near misses/adverse events (57% incomplete vs. 10% complete, P < 0.01), and more time resolving issues arising from missed information (71% incomplete vs. 22% complete, P < 0.01). Qualitative comments suggest the need for a more systematic, focused, team-based, and patient-centered handoff model.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete handoffs during service changes are associated with uncertainty and potential patient harm. Suggestions to improve the completeness of hospitalist service change communications are offered.

摘要

背景

关于服务变更期间医院医生沟通的信息很少。

目的

描述服务变更期间医院医生的交接情况。

设计

连续调查研究。

地点

单家学术医疗中心。

测量

2007 年 5 月至 12 月,17 名医院医生中的 60 名在非教学服务中进行了服务变更,他们通过在承担患者护理后 48 小时内完成的匿名 18 项调查,对服务变更进行评估。调查项目评估了交接沟通的完整性、患者护理计划的确定性、遗漏信息、恢复信息所花费的时间,以及因交接不完整而导致的险些发生/不良事件。检查了沟通的完整性与交接结果之间的关联。对叙述性评论进行了定性分析。

结果

93%(56/60)的调查得到了回复。所有 17 名医院医生都参与了调查。13%的受访者报告了交接不完整,18%的受访者在交接日对护理计划不确定。16%的受访者报告至少发生了 1 起险些发生的不良事件,归因于沟通不完整。报告交接不完整的医院医生更有可能在交接日对患者护理计划不确定(71%不完整与 10%完整,P < 0.01),发现信息缺失(71%不完整与 24%完整,P = 0.01),险些发生/不良事件(57%不完整与 10%完整,P < 0.01),以及花更多的时间解决因信息缺失而产生的问题(71%不完整与 22%完整,P < 0.01)。定性评论表明需要一个更系统、更集中、以团队为基础和以患者为中心的交接模式。

结论

服务变更期间的交接不完整与不确定性和潜在的患者伤害有关。提出了改进医院医生服务变更沟通完整性的建议。

相似文献

1
Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: a mixed methods study.理解医院服务变革期间的沟通:一项混合方法研究。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov;4(9):535-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.523.
2
A qualitative analysis of patients' experience with hospitalist service handovers.对患者住院医师服务交接体验的定性分析。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Oct;11(10):675-681. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2608. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Assessing the implementation of a bedside service handoff on an academic hospitalist service.评估在学术型内科医师服务中实施床边服务交接的情况。
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Jun;6(2):117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Communicating in the "gray zone": perceptions about emergency physician hospitalist handoffs and patient safety.在“灰色地带”进行沟通:关于急诊科医生与住院医生交接班及患者安全的认知
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):884-94. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.037.
5
Exploring emergency physician-hospitalist handoff interactions: development of the Handoff Communication Assessment.探索急诊医师-医院医师交班交互作用:交班沟通评估的制定。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;55(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.09.021. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
6
Hospitalist handoffs: a systematic review and task force recommendations.医院病床交接:系统评价和工作组建议。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep;4(7):433-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.573.
7
Assessing patient perceptions of hospitalist communication skills using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT).使用沟通评估工具(CAT)评估患者对医院医生沟通技巧的看法。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(9):522-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.787.
8
Effectiveness of written hospitalist sign-outs in answering overnight inquiries.住院医师书面交班对回答夜间咨询的有效性。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Nov;8(11):609-14. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2090. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
9
Hospitalist time usage and cyclicality: opportunities to improve efficiency.住院医师时间利用和周期性:提高效率的机会。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(6):329-34. doi: 10.1002/jhm.613.
10
Measuring patient experiences on hospitalist and teaching services: Patient responses to a 30-day postdischarge questionnaire.衡量住院医师和教学服务中的患者体验:患者对出院后30天调查问卷的回应。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Feb;11(2):99-104. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2485. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of duty cycle workflow on sign-out practices: a qualitative study of an internal medicine residency program in Maryland, USA.工作周期工作流程对交班实践的影响:对美国马里兰州一个内科住院医师培训项目的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e015762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015762.
2
Transition of Care Practices from Emergency Department to Inpatient: Survey Data and Development of Algorithm.从急诊科到住院部的患者交接实践的转变:调查数据和算法的开发。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):86-92. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.9.31004. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Patient Education on the Role of the Hospitalist: A Cross-Sectional Study.
评估YouTube作为患者关于住院医师角色教育来源的研究:一项横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jan 10;6(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6393.
4
ICU Attending Handoff Practices: Results From a National Survey of Academic Intensivists.重症监护病房主治医生的交接班实践:一项针对学术型重症医学专家的全国性调查结果
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):690-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001470.
5
(Re)Introducing communication competence to the health professions.将沟通能力重新引入健康专业领域。
J Public Health Res. 2013 Dec 1;2(3):e23. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2013.e23.
6
Considering Factors of and Knowledge About Patients in Handover Assessment.交接评估中患者的相关因素及认知
IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2013 Sep 1;43(5):494-498. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2013.2274595.
7
Documentation quality of inpatient code status discussions.住院患者代码状态讨论的文档质量。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
8
Implementation of a computerized patient handoff application.计算机化患者交接应用程序的实施。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:1395-400. eCollection 2013.
9
Use of simulated physician handoffs to study cross-cover chart biopsy in the electronic medical record.利用模拟医生交接班来研究电子病历中的交叉覆盖图表活检。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:766-75. eCollection 2013.
10
Sustainability and effectiveness of a quality improvement project to improve handoffs to night float residents in an internal medicine residency program.一项旨在改善内科住院医师培训项目中向夜间轮值住院医师交接班质量的质量改进项目的可持续性和有效性。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):303-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00175.1.