Akhmedov V A, Dolgikh V T, Naumov D V, Dvornikov V E
Klin Med (Mosk). 2009;87(10):17-9.
The aim of the study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers and inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ECE) for protective therapy following medicamentous cardioversion with propafen at a loading dose of 600 mg in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension. 101 patients were divided in 2 groups. Group 1 included 75 patients who received ACE inhibitor lisinopril (10 mg BID) after recovery of sinus rhythm by propanorm. 26 patients of group 2 were treated with angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan (8 mg daily). Combined treatment with angiotensin II receptor blocker and propafenone leads to cardioversion faster than therapy with ACR inhibitor. It is concluded that alternative approach to the maintenance of sinus rhythm using angiotensin II receptor blockers has advantages over traditional anti-arrhythmic therapy; it is well tolerated by the patients and produced no serious side effects.
本研究旨在评估血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶(ECE)抑制剂对使用600mg负荷剂量普罗帕酮进行药物复律后的阵发性心房颤动和动脉高血压患者进行保护性治疗的有效性和安全性。101例患者分为2组。第1组包括75例在心律平恢复窦性心律后接受ACE抑制剂赖诺普利(10mg,每日两次)的患者。第2组的26例患者接受血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦(每日8mg)治疗。血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂与普罗帕酮联合治疗比ACR抑制剂治疗导致复律更快。得出结论,使用血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂维持窦性心律的替代方法比传统抗心律失常治疗具有优势;患者耐受性良好,未产生严重副作用。