• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚焦血管通路教育以减少长期隧道式血液透析导管的使用:一项网络质量改进计划的结果

Focused vascular access education to reduce the use of chronic tunneled hemodialysis catheters: results of a network quality improvement initiative.

作者信息

Kulawik Deuzimar, Sands Jeffrey J, Mayo Kelly, Fenderson Mary, Hutchinson Janet, Woodward Cindy, Gore Sally, Asif Arif

机构信息

The End Stage Renal Network of Florida, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):692-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00647.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00647.x
PMID:20017841
Abstract

Tunneled hemodialysis catheters (TDCs) carry the highest mortality risk for chronic hemodialysis patients of any access modality. Recent data have emphasized that mortality risk decreases when these devices are discontinued. Herein, we present the results of a gap-reduction assisted catheter elimination strategy that Network 7 employed as its quality improvement initiative to reduce the use of TDCs. Hemodialysis facilities with high catheter rates (>90 days) were identified. Interventions included focused vascular access education, monthly follow-up and site visits to assist the facility catheter reduction program. The "goal" of interventions was defined as the gap-reduction of 50% from the baseline catheter rate to the Network mean plus sustainability of catheter reduction for at least 3 consecutive months. Fifteen facilities (n = 891) were identified with high catheter rates (31.5 +/- 5.3%) in May 2006. Interventions resulted in a catheter reduction to 12.2 +/- 8.5% in May 2007 (p = 0.0001). Five of the 15 facilities (n = 280) achieved the goal (preintervention = 31.7 +/- 5.3%, postintervention = 8.7 +/- 2.8%, p = 0.001). In May 2007, eight additional facilities (n = 438) with high catheter rates (31.7 +/- 7.8%) were added to the 10 that failed to achieve the goal previously. Interventions employed in these 18 facilities (n = 1,049) resulted in catheter reduction in all (preintervention = 31.5 +/- 5.5%, postintervention = 16.2 +/- 5%, p = 0.01). Five of these 18 met the goal (preintervention = 32 +/- 8%, postintervention = 5.9 +/- 4.3%). Overall, all 23 facilities (n = 1,329) demonstrated catheter reduction postintervention (preintervention = 31.6 +/- 6%, postintervention = 13.9 +/- 6%, p = 0.001), and 10/23 (43%) met the project goal (preintervention = 31.9 +/- 6%, postintervention = 7.3 +/- 4%, p = 0.002). Medical director's involvement had a positive impact in achieving the goal (p = 0.003). The presence or absence of a vascular access coordinator did not affect catheter reduction. The results of this analysis reveals that an organized approach implemented by an ESRD Network can have a significant impact in reducing catheter use.

摘要

对于慢性血液透析患者而言,隧道式血液透析导管(TDC)在所有血管通路方式中具有最高的死亡风险。近期数据强调,停用这些装置时死亡风险会降低。在此,我们呈现了第7网络作为其质量改进举措采用的一种减少差距辅助导管消除策略的结果,该策略旨在减少TDC的使用。确定了导管使用率高(>90天)的血液透析机构。干预措施包括针对性的血管通路教育、每月随访以及实地考察,以协助机构的导管减少计划。干预措施的“目标”定义为从基线导管使用率降至网络平均水平的差距减少50%,并使导管减少持续至少连续3个月。2006年5月,确定了15个机构(n = 891)导管使用率高(31.5±5.3%)。干预措施使2007年5月的导管使用率降至12.2±8.5%(p = 0.0001)。15个机构中有5个(n = 280)实现了目标(干预前 = 31.7±5.3%,干预后 = 8.7±2.8%,p = 0.001)。2007年5月,另外8个导管使用率高(31.7±7.8%)的机构(n = 438)被加入到之前未实现目标的10个机构中。在这18个机构(n = 1,049)中采用的干预措施导致所有机构导管减少(干预前 = 31.5±5.5%,干预后 = 16.2±5%,p = 0.01)。这18个机构中有5个实现了目标(干预前 = 32±8%,干预后 = 5.9±4.3%)。总体而言,所有23个机构(n = 1,329)在干预后均显示导管减少(干预前 = 31.6±6%,干预后 = 13.9±6%,p = 0.001),并且23个中有10个(43%)实现了项目目标(干预前 = 31.9±6%,干预后 = 7.3±4%,p = 0.002)。医疗主任的参与对实现目标有积极影响(p = 0.003)。血管通路协调员的有无并不影响导管减少。该分析结果表明,终末期肾病网络实施的有组织方法在减少导管使用方面可产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Focused vascular access education to reduce the use of chronic tunneled hemodialysis catheters: results of a network quality improvement initiative.聚焦血管通路教育以减少长期隧道式血液透析导管的使用:一项网络质量改进计划的结果
Semin Dial. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):692-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00647.x.
2
Improving adequacy of hemodialysis in Northern California ESRD patients: a final project report. Provider Participants and Medical Review Board of the TransPacific Renal Network.提高北加利福尼亚终末期肾病患者的血液透析充分性:最终项目报告。泛太平洋肾脏网络的提供者参与者和医学审查委员会。
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000 Oct;7(4 Suppl 1):S85-94.
3
Mission possible: vascular access-decreasing the use of catheters in the Texas hemodialysis community.
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000 Oct;7(4 Suppl 1):S76-80.
4
Tunneled catheters in hemodialysis patients: reasons and subsequent outcomes.血液透析患者的带隧道导管:原因及后续结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Sep;46(3):501-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.05.024.
5
Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to permanent hemodialysis catheters: a retrospective study of catheter exchange versus classic de novo placement.临时血液透析导管转换为永久性血液透析导管:导管更换与经典重新置管的回顾性研究
Semin Dial. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):425-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.00081.x.
6
Conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters.非隧道式血液透析导管转换为隧道式血液透析导管。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):222-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-006-0101-0.
7
Restoration of patency in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping.失功带隧道血液透析导管通畅性的恢复:导管更换、纤维蛋白鞘更换及球囊破坏与股静脉剥脱术的比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Jun;17(6):1011-5. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000223692.99800.2e.
8
Antibiotic prophylaxis: is it needed for dialysis access procedures?抗生素预防:透析通路手术需要吗?
Semin Dial. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):297-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00607.x.
9
Improving compliance with the dialysis prescription as a strategy to increase the delivered dose of hemodialysis: an ESRD Network 4 quality improvement project.将提高透析处方依从性作为增加血液透析输送剂量的策略:一项终末期肾病网络4质量改进项目。
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000 Oct;7(4 Suppl 1):S21-30.
10
Conversion of vascular access type among incident hemodialysis patients: description and association with mortality.新接受血液透析患者的血管通路类型转换:描述及其与死亡率的关联
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 May;53(5):804-14. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.031. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of "CKD-PeriDialysis"-the Periods Prior to and in the Early-Stage of Initial Dialysis.《“慢性肾脏病-腹膜透析”——初始透析前及早期阶段管理的中国临床实践指南》
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Dec 12;7(12 Suppl):S531-S558. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.10.001. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Center-Effect of Incident Hemodialysis Vascular Access Use: Analysis of a Bi-national Registry.中心静脉置管对 incident hemodialysis vascular access 的影响:一项国际性登记研究的分析。
Kidney360. 2021 Feb 9;2(4):674-683. doi: 10.34067/KID.0005742020. eCollection 2021 Apr 29.
3
Quality indicators of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis.
用于血液透析的血管通路程序的质量指标。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Mar;53(3):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02609-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
A Multidisciplinary Self-Directed Learning Module Improves Knowledge of a Quality Improvement Instrument: The HEART Pathway.一个多学科自主学习模块提高了对质量改进工具“HEART 路径”的认识。
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;40(1):e9-e14. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000044.
5
The importance of success prediction in angioaccess surgery.血管通路手术中成功预测的重要性。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Sep;48(9):1469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1318-8. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.关于理解低价值临床实践的弃用:一项范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 6;13:255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0488-z.
7
Hemodialysis access usage patterns in the incident dialysis year and associated catheter-related complications.起始透析年份的血液透析通路使用模式及相关导管相关性并发症。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):123-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
8
Arteriovenous graft placement in predialysis patients: a potential catheter-sparing strategy.透析前患者动静脉移植物置放术:一种潜在的导管保留策略。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Aug;58(2):243-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.026. Epub 2011 Apr 2.