Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Feb;35(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
The objectives of this study were (i) to compare the plasma concentration-time profiles for first-dose and steady-state piperacillin administered by intermittent or continuous dosing to critically ill patients with sepsis and (ii) to use population pharmacokinetics to perform Monte Carlo dosing simulations in order to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for different piperacillin dosing regimens against bacterial pathogens commonly encountered in critical care units. Plasma samples were collected on Days 1 and 2 of therapy in 16 critically ill patients, with 8 patients receiving intermittent bolus dosing and 8 patients receiving continuous infusion of piperacillin (administered with tazobactam). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM, which found that a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model best described the data. Total body weight was found to be correlated with drug clearance and was included in the final model. In addition, 2000 critically ill patients were simulated for pharmacodynamic evaluation of PTA by MIC [free (unbound) concentration maintained above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval (50% f(T>MIC))] and it was found that continuous infusion maintained superior free piperacillin concentrations compared with bolus administration across the dosing interval. Dosing simulations showed that administration of 16g/day by continuous infusion vs. bolus dosing (4g every 6h) provided superior achievement of the pharmacodynamic endpoint (PTA by MIC) at 93% and 53%, respectively. These data suggest that administration of piperacillin by continuous infusion, with a loading dose, both for first dose and for subsequent dosing achieves superior pharmacodynamic targets compared with conventional bolus dosing.
(i)比较脓毒症危重症患者间歇或连续输注哌拉西林时首剂和稳态的血药浓度-时间曲线;(ii)利用群体药代动力学,通过蒙特卡罗给药模拟来评估不同哌拉西林给药方案对重症监护病房常见细菌病原体的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)的达标概率(PTA)。在 16 名危重症患者的治疗第 1 天和第 2 天采集血样,其中 8 名患者接受间歇推注给药,8 名患者接受哌拉西林持续输注(与他唑巴坦联合使用)。采用 NONMEM 建立群体药代动力学模型,结果表明,两室群体药代动力学模型能最好地描述数据。发现总体重与药物清除率相关,并包含在最终模型中。此外,还对 2000 名危重症患者进行了模拟,以评估通过 MIC 的药效学达标概率(游离(未结合)浓度在给药间隔的 50%时间(50% f(T>MIC))上维持在 MIC 以上),结果发现,与推注给药相比,连续输注在整个给药间隔内保持了较高的游离哌拉西林浓度。给药模拟表明,与传统推注给药(每 6 小时 4g)相比,连续输注 16g/天(负荷剂量)的给药方式能更好地实现药效学终点(通过 MIC 的 PTA),分别为 93%和 53%。这些数据表明,与传统推注给药相比,连续输注,包括首剂和后续剂量,能更好地实现哌拉西林的药效学目标。