Pharmacology of Pain Group, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, UCL, London, UK.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010 Mar;4(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328335ddfe.
Opioids are invaluable in the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain. Unfortunately, their prolonged use may be associated with the onset of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). This review focuses on recent clinical studies that support or refute the existence of OIH in patients.
Whether or not OIH is a clinical reality is an ongoing debate. In recent years, the majority of clinical trials investigating whether chronic-opioid treatment causes paradoxical pain sensations have been conducted in opioid addicts, patients maintained on methadone and human volunteers receiving acute-morphine infusions. That opioid-maintained patients have different nociceptive profiles compared with opioid naïve patients has been both raised and rejected. Independent studies have reinforced the opinion that the development of OIH is based on confounders including pain modality tested, route of drug administration and specific opioid in question.
Improvements in paradoxical pain intensity upon discontinuation of opioid therapy suggests that a multidisciplinary method of pain relief is favoured for chronic-pain patients. Quantitative-sensory testing of pain is offered as the most appropriate way of diagnosing hyperalgesia. We can, thus far only reliably validate the existence of OIH development in normal human volunteers receiving acute-morphine infusions.
阿片类药物在治疗中重度疼痛方面具有不可估量的价值。不幸的是,其长期使用可能与阿片类药物诱导的痛觉过敏(OIH)的发生有关。本综述重点关注支持或反驳患者存在 OIH 的最新临床研究。
OIH 是否是一种临床现实仍存在争议。近年来,大多数研究慢性阿片类药物治疗是否引起矛盾性疼痛感觉的临床试验都是在阿片类药物成瘾者、接受美沙酮维持治疗的患者和接受急性吗啡输注的人类志愿者中进行的。与阿片类药物未使用患者相比,阿片类药物维持患者的疼痛感受特征不同,这一观点既得到了提出,也遭到了否定。独立研究加强了这样一种观点,即 OIH 的发展基于混杂因素,包括测试的疼痛模式、给药途径和特定的阿片类药物。
停止阿片类药物治疗后矛盾性疼痛强度的改善表明,对于慢性疼痛患者,多学科疼痛缓解方法更为有利。疼痛的定量感觉测试被认为是诊断痛觉过敏的最合适方法。到目前为止,我们只能可靠地验证在接受急性吗啡输注的正常人类志愿者中 OIH 发展的存在。