Suppr超能文献

术后漂白对不同延迟暴露于过氧化脲时期的树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离子修复体边缘渗漏的影响。

Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.

作者信息

Moosavi Horieh, Ghavamnasiri Marjaneh, Manari Vahideh

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov 1;10(6):E009-16.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effect of dental bleaching with carbamide peroxide at different exposure times on the microleakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations after placement in extracted human teeth.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

120 Class V cavity preparations were placed at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of human teeth. Half of the cavities were restored with Filtek P60 resin composite (C) and the other half were restored with Fuji II LC resin-modified glass ionomer (G). Each group was randomly divided into four subgroups (n=15). Groups C1 and G1 were not bleached and stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C to serve as control groups, while in Groups C2 and G2, C3 and G3, and C4 and G4 specimens were exposed to a 15% carbamide peroxide gel for one day, one week, and two weeks, respectively, following the placement of restorations. Microleakage was assessed using the dye penetration method. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p=0.05).

RESULTS

The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among all groups of composite or glass ionomer restorations with either enamel or dentinal margins with regard to microleakage (p>0.05). The Wilcoxon test revealed more marginal leakage in the enamel/glass ionomer margins than the enamel/composite margins (p<0.05). In comparisons within each group, the Wilcoxon test showed there was more microleakage in dentinal margins of composite restorations than in the enamel margins in the test groups (p<0.05). The dentinal margins of the glass ionomer in control groups showed more leakage than the enamel margins, but after the bleaching procedure all experimental groups showed statistically similar microleakage in both the enamel and dentinal margins (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative bleaching with carbamide peroxide could increase microleakage in the dentinal margins of composite and the enamel margins of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Rebonding of resin composite restorations should be considered following bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide in order to reseal the margins. Resin-modified glass ionomer is not suitable as a filling material before bleaching because of its susceptibility to increased microleakage.

摘要

目的

评估不同暴露时间的过氧化脲牙齿漂白对人离体牙中树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离子修复体微渗漏的影响。

方法和材料

在人牙的牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)制备120个V类洞。一半的洞用Filtek P60树脂复合材料(C)修复,另一半用Fuji II LC树脂改性玻璃离子(G)修复。每组随机分为四个亚组(n = 15)。C1组和G1组不进行漂白,在37℃的人工唾液中储存作为对照组,而在C2组和G2组、C3组和G3组、C4组和G4组中,修复体放置后,标本分别暴露于15%的过氧化脲凝胶中一天、一周和两周。使用染料渗透法评估微渗漏。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon检验进行分析(p = 0.05)。

结果

Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,所有复合树脂或玻璃离子修复体组在釉质或牙本质边缘的微渗漏方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。Wilcoxon检验显示,釉质/玻璃离子边缘的边缘渗漏比釉质/复合树脂边缘更多(p<0.05)。在每组内部比较中,Wilcoxon检验显示,测试组中复合树脂修复体的牙本质边缘微渗漏比釉质边缘更多(p<0.05)。对照组中玻璃离子的牙本质边缘渗漏比釉质边缘更多,但漂白程序后,所有实验组在釉质和牙本质边缘的微渗漏在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。

结论

过氧化脲术后漂白可增加复合树脂修复体牙本质边缘和树脂改性玻璃离子修复体釉质边缘的微渗漏。

临床意义

用15%过氧化脲漂白后应考虑对树脂复合材料修复体进行重新粘结,以重新封闭边缘。树脂改性玻璃离子由于其对微渗漏增加的敏感性,不适合在漂白前作为填充材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验