Hashemi Kamangar Sedighe Sadat, Ghavam Maryam, Mahinfar Nazanin, Pourhashemi Seyed Jalal
Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Aug;39(3):172-9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.172. Epub 2014 May 13.
This study aimed to assess the effect of 38% carbamide peroxide on the microleakage of class V cavities restored with either a silorane-based composite or two methacrylate-based composites.
A total of 96 class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of extracted human teeth with both enamel and dentin margins and were randomly assigned into three groups of Filtek P90 (3M-ESPE) + P90 system adhesive (3M-ESPE)(group A), Filtek Z250 (3M-ESPE) + Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M-ESPE)(group B) and Filtek Z350XT (3M-ESPE) + Adper Prompt L-Pop (group C). Half of the teeth were randomly underwent bleaching (38% carbamide peroxide, Day White, Discus Dental, applying for 15 min, twice a day for 14 day) while the remaining half (control) were not bleached. Dye penetration was measured following immersion in basic fuchsine. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at a level of 0.05.
No significant differences were found between composites in the control groups in enamel (p = 0.171) or dentin (p = 0.094) margins. After bleaching, microleakage of Z250 (in enamel [p = 0.867] or dentin [p = 0.590] margins) and Z350 (in enamel [p = 0.445] or dentin [p = 0.591] margins) did not change significantly, but the microleakage of P90 significantly increased in both enamel (p = 0.042) and dentin (p = 0.002) margins.
No significant differences were noted between the bleached and control subgroups of two methacrylate-based composites in enamel or dentin margins. Microleakage of silorane-based composite significantly increased after bleaching.
本研究旨在评估38%过氧化脲对用硅烷类复合树脂或两种甲基丙烯酸酯类复合树脂修复的Ⅴ类洞微渗漏的影响。
在拔除的人牙颊面制备96个Ⅴ类洞,洞缘包括釉质和牙本质,随机分为三组,分别使用Filtek P90(3M-ESPE)+P90系统粘结剂(3M-ESPE)(A组)、Filtek Z250(3M-ESPE)+Adper Prompt L-Pop(3M-ESPE)(B组)和Filtek Z350XT(3M-ESPE)+Adper Prompt L-Pop(C组)。一半牙齿随机进行漂白(38%过氧化脲,Day White,Discus Dental,每次15分钟,每天两次,共14天),另一半(对照组)不进行漂白。将牙齿浸入碱性品红后测量染料渗透情况。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析,检验水准为0.05。
对照组中,复合树脂在釉质边缘(p = 0.171)或牙本质边缘(p = 0.094)无显著差异。漂白后,Z250(在釉质边缘[p = 0.867]或牙本质边缘[p = 0.590])和Z350(在釉质边缘[p = 0.445]或牙本质边缘[p = 0.591])的微渗漏无显著变化,但P90在釉质边缘(p = 0.042)和牙本质边缘(p = 0.002)的微渗漏均显著增加。
两种甲基丙烯酸酯类复合树脂的漂白亚组和对照亚组在釉质或牙本质边缘无显著差异。硅烷类复合树脂漂白后微渗漏显著增加。