School of Management, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(6):642-55. doi: 10.1108/14777260911001653.
This article aims to examine tensions between hybrid clinician managers' professional values and health care organisations' management objectives.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Data are from interviews conducted with, and observation of, 14 managerial participants in a Cancer Therapy Unit set in a large teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia, who participated in a Clinical Leadership Development Program.
The data indicate that there are tensions experienced by members of the health care organisation when a hybrid clinician manager appears to abandon the managerial role for the clinical role. The data also indicate that when a hybrid clinician manager takes on a managerial role other members of the health care organisation are required concomitantly to increase their clinical roles.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Although the research was represented by a small sample and was limited to one department of a health care organisation, it is possible that other members of health care organisations experience similar situations when they work with hybrid clinician managers. Other research supports the findings. Also, this paper reports on data that emerged from a research project that was evaluating a Clinical Leadership Development Program. The research was not specifically focused on organisational professional conflict in health care organisations.
This paper shows that the role of the hybrid clinician manager may not bring with it the organisational effectiveness that the role was perceived to have. Hybrid clinician managers abandoning their managerial role for their clinical role may mean that some managerial work is not done. Increasing the workload of other clinical members of the health care organisation may not be optimal for the health care organisation.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Organisational professional conflict, as a result of hybridity and divergent managerial and clinical objectives, can cause conflict which affects other organisational members and this conflict may have implications for the efficiency of the health care organisation. The extension or duality of organisational professional conflict that causes interpersonal or group conflict in other members of the organisation, to the authors' knowledge, has not yet been researched.
本文旨在探讨混合临床经理人的职业价值观与医疗机构管理目标之间的紧张关系。
设计/方法/途径:数据来自于对澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家大型教学医院癌症治疗中心的 14 名管理参与者进行的访谈和观察,这些参与者参加了临床领导力发展计划。
数据表明,当混合临床经理似乎放弃管理角色而专注于临床角色时,医疗机构的成员会感到紧张。数据还表明,当混合临床经理承担管理角色时,医疗机构的其他成员需要同时增加他们的临床角色。
研究局限性/影响:尽管这项研究的样本较小,且仅限于医疗机构的一个部门,但其他医疗机构的成员在与混合临床经理合作时可能会经历类似的情况。其他研究也支持这一发现。此外,本文报告了一项评估临床领导力发展计划的研究项目中出现的数据。该研究并非专门针对医疗机构中的组织职业冲突。
本文表明,混合临床经理的角色可能不会带来该角色被认为具有的组织效率。混合临床经理放弃管理角色而专注于临床角色可能意味着一些管理工作未完成。增加医疗机构其他临床成员的工作量可能不是医疗机构的最佳选择。
原创性/价值:由于混合性和不同的管理与临床目标,组织职业冲突可能导致冲突,影响其他组织成员,这种冲突可能对医疗机构的效率产生影响。作者认为,到目前为止,尚未研究导致组织其他成员之间人际或群体冲突的组织职业冲突的扩展或双重性。