• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员对电子病历的态度:问卷调查。

Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey.

机构信息

The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jul;47(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016
PMID:20022007
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing number of health care organizations are implementing a system of electronic patient records (EPR). This implies a change in work routines for nursing staff, but it could also be regarded as an opportunity to improve the quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to obtain more insight into the usefulness of EPR as perceived by nursing staff and to clarify the determinants of nursing staff's acceptance of EPR. Determinants were tested using an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model.

DESIGN

Nursing staff members (NAs and RNs) completed a survey questionnaire about the use of EPR in health care, and their experiences, perceptions and attitudes regarding EPR.

SETTINGS

All nursing staff members were working in Dutch hospitals, psychiatric organizations, care organizations for mentally retarded people, home care organizations, nursing homes or homes for the elderly.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population is a nationally representative Dutch research sample, further referred to as the Nursing Staff Panel. The Panel consists of a permanent group of Nursing Assistants (NAs) and Registered Nurses (RNs), who are prepared to fill in a postal questionnaire twice a year on average. In January 2009, 685 participants completed the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nursing staff members associate EPR with improved care, especially qualitatively better and safer care. They also expect an increase in costs of care, while anticipating only a relatively small rise in the number of patients that can be cared for. In general, the effects of EPR on the work circumstances of nursing staff are expected to be negative. Job-related characteristics were found to be determinants of attitudes towards using EPR. A relatively positive attitude towards EPR was found in three categories of nursing staff in particular, i.e. staff working at least 30h per week, staff already using EPR and staff working in hospitals. Nursing staff in management positions also tend to have a more positive attitude. When the Technology Acceptance Model was tested, attitudes towards EPR were primarily associated with job-related characteristics and perceived usefulness with respect to quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation strategies for EPR need to take account of the job characteristics of the intended future users. If implementation is to be successful, it is important that the users understand the beneficial effects of EPR on the quality of care.

摘要

背景

越来越多的医疗机构正在实施电子病历系统(EPR)。这意味着护理人员的工作流程发生了变化,但也可以将其视为提高护理质量的机会。

目的

本文旨在更深入地了解护理人员对 EPR 的实用性的看法,并阐明影响护理人员接受 EPR 的因素。使用扩展后的技术接受模型来测试这些决定因素。

设计

护理人员(护士助理和注册护士)填写了一份关于医疗保健中使用 EPR 的调查问卷,以及他们对 EPR 的使用经验、看法和态度。

设置

所有护理人员都在荷兰的医院、精神病组织、智障人士护理组织、家庭护理组织、养老院或老年人护理院工作。

参与者

研究人群是具有代表性的荷兰护理人员研究样本,进一步称为护理人员小组。该小组由一组固定的护士助理(NA)和注册护士(RN)组成,他们平均每年准备填写两次邮寄问卷。2009 年 1 月,有 685 名参与者完成了问卷。

结果

护理人员将 EPR 与改善护理联系起来,特别是在质量上更好和更安全的护理。他们还预计护理成本会增加,而预计可以护理的患者数量只会略有增加。一般来说,EPR 对护理人员工作环境的影响预计将是负面的。与工作相关的特征被发现是对使用 EPR 的态度的决定因素。在特定的三个护理人员类别中发现了对 EPR 的相对积极态度,即每周至少工作 30 小时的工作人员、已经使用 EPR 的工作人员和在医院工作的工作人员。担任管理职位的护理人员也往往持更积极的态度。当测试技术接受模型时,对 EPR 的态度主要与工作相关的特征和与护理质量相关的感知有用性相关。

结论

EPR 的实施策略需要考虑到预期未来用户的工作特点。如果要实施成功,重要的是让用户了解 EPR 对护理质量的有益影响。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey.护理人员对电子病历的态度:问卷调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jul;47(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016.
2
Nursing staff competence, work strain, stress and satisfaction in elderly care: a comparison of home-based care and nursing homes.老年护理中护理人员的能力、工作压力、应激与满意度:居家护理与养老院的比较
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(4):468-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01803.x. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
3
Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.护士对在电子健康记录中使用标准化护理计划的体验与看法——一项问卷调查研究
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02377.x.
4
Attitudes and perceptions towards oral hygiene tasks among geriatric nursing home staff.老年人护理院工作人员对口腔卫生任务的态度和看法。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Aug;9(3):199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00477.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
5
Nursing and health care reform: implications for curriculum development.护理与医疗保健改革:对课程开发的影响。
J Nurs Educ. 2000 Jan;39(1):27-33.
6
Registered nurses' education and their views on competence development in municipal elderly care in Sweden: a questionnaire survey.瑞典注册护士在市政老年护理方面的教育及其对能力发展的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Feb;44(2):245-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.029. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
7
Registered Nurses working together with family members of older people.注册护士与老年人的家庭成员共同协作。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Mar;15(3):281-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01308.x.
8
Electronic nursing documentation in primary health care.初级卫生保健中的电子护理记录
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Sep;18(3):310-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00282.x.
9
District nursing staff and depression: a psychometric evaluation of Depression Attitude Questionnaire findings.社区护理人员与抑郁症:抑郁态度问卷结果的心理测量学评估
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
10
Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.影响科威特医院护士对使用计算机化健康信息系统态度的因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Feb;57(4):375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04113.x.

引用本文的文献

1
'Technology in end-of-life care is very important': the view of nurses regarding technology and end-of-life care.“临终关怀中的技术非常重要”:护士对技术与临终关怀的看法。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Nov 6;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02475-x.
2
A scale for measuring nursing digital application skills: a development and psychometric testing study.护理数字应用技能测量量表:一项开发与心理测量测试研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 May 31;23(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02030-8.
3
Therapies go digital. What drives physicians' acceptance?疗法走向数字化。是什么推动了医生的接受度?
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303302. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and Validation of Information Technology Scale in Nursing.护理信息技术量表的编制与验证。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):220-229. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782229. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
Risks in the analogue and digitally-supported medication process and potential solutions to increase patient safety in the hospital: A mixed methods study.模拟和数字支持的用药流程中的风险以及提高医院患者安全性的潜在解决方案:混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0297491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297491. eCollection 2024.
6
Health professionals' sentiments towards implemented information technologies in psychiatric hospitals: a text-mining analysis.精神科医院中实施的信息技术对卫生专业人员的影响:文本挖掘分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):1426. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08823-4.
7
An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication.一项综合综述,旨在探讨电子健康记录(EHR)对护患互动和沟通质量的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jan;79(1):48-67. doi: 10.1111/jan.15484. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses.护理记录及其与感知护理工作量的关系:一项针对社区护士的混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jan 28;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00811-7.
9
A survey of ambulance clinicians' perceptions of recording and communicating patient information electronically.一项关于救护车临床医护人员对以电子方式记录和传达患者信息的看法的调查。
Br Paramed J. 2021 May 1;6(1):1-7. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.1.
10
Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification.理论指导电子健康实施:系统评价和分类学分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 31;23(5):e18500. doi: 10.2196/18500.