Suppr超能文献

残余生活垃圾:从按量付费到按重量付费。弗拉芒地区的评估研究。

Residual household waste: from pay-per-bag to pay-per-kilogram. An evaluation study for Flanders.

机构信息

Hogeschool Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2010 Apr;28(4):330-9. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09351332. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Abstract

To be in line with the polluter-pays principle, an increasing number of Flemish municipalities have introduced a weight-based pricing system for residual household waste. Municipalities using this new pricing scheme are keen to ascribe decreasing waste production to the introduction of the new system. In order to evaluate the real impact of the weight-based pricing, an extension to the standard difference-in-differences evaluation techniques is proposed. The main idea is to use historical observations on waste production to determine which version of the difference-in-differences technique is most suitable to assess the impact of a policy action on waste quantities. The method is easy to apply, which makes it a very useful tool for both scientists and policy makers. Surprisingly, empirical results for Flanders indicate that, on average, municipalities using the weight-based system do not perform better than other municipalities.

摘要

为了符合污染者付费原则,越来越多的佛兰德自治区采用了基于重量的生活垃圾定价制度。采用这种新定价方案的自治区热衷于将垃圾产量的减少归因于新系统的引入。为了评估基于重量的定价的实际影响,提出了对标准差异-差异评估技术的扩展。其主要思想是使用关于垃圾产量的历史观测值来确定哪种差异-差异技术版本最适合评估政策行动对垃圾数量的影响。该方法易于应用,因此对于科学家和决策者来说都是一个非常有用的工具。令人惊讶的是,佛兰德的实证结果表明,平均而言,采用基于重量的系统的自治区并不比其他自治区表现得更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验