De Jaeger Simon, Eyckmans Johan
Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium
Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium.
Waste Manag Res. 2015 Dec;33(12):1103-11. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15610422. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Weight-based pricing systems for municipal solid waste collection and processing are increasingly popular in many European countries and regions. However, the impact on waste generation of such pricing schedules remains debated and depends strongly on the practical details of the system used. This article assesses the impact of a voluntary transition by Flemish municipalities from the default price-per-bag pricing systems to a more sophisticated weight-based pricing schedule. By (1) exploiting alternative statistical techniques, (2) using more recent data and (3) focusing on the introduction effect of the new pricing schedule, we are able to complement and refine prior research on this topic. Our results indicate that introducing weight-based pricing has initially a significant and substantial downward impact on the amount of residual municipal solid waste per capita. This result is robust under different methodologies that control for selection bias. There are however, indications that this initial effect does not persist in the years after introduction.
基于重量的城市固体废物收集和处理定价系统在许多欧洲国家和地区越来越受欢迎。然而,这种定价方案对垃圾产生量的影响仍存在争议,并且在很大程度上取决于所使用系统的实际细节。本文评估了弗拉芒地区各市镇从默认的按袋定价系统自愿过渡到更复杂的基于重量的定价方案的影响。通过(1)采用替代统计技术,(2)使用更新的数据,以及(3)关注新定价方案的引入效应,我们能够补充和完善此前关于该主题的研究。我们的结果表明,引入基于重量的定价最初对人均城市残余固体废物量有显著且大幅的下降影响。在控制选择偏差的不同方法下,这一结果是稳健的。然而,有迹象表明,这种初始效应在引入后的几年中并未持续。