Suppr超能文献

群体 MET 为何有效?一项针对大学生饮酒者的强制性酒精转移随机对照试验

What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.

机构信息

National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Dec;23(4):598-612. doi: 10.1037/a0016633.

Abstract

Nationally, college drinkers exhibit the highest rates of alcohol consumption and represent the largest percentage of problem drinkers. Group motivational enhancement therapy (GMET) has been found to catalyze problem drinking reductions among college student samples. Although research supporting the use of single-session GMET in college samples (general and mandated) is emergent, no studies have evaluated a comprehensive model of the potential active ingredients of this group intervention. College students (N = 206; 88% White; 63% men; M age = 18.6) mandated to a university alcohol diversion program were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: the standard-of-care 2-session "Focus on Alcohol Concerns" education group (FAC), a single GMET, or a single alcohol information-only control group (AI) to evaluate the role of 5 putative mediators: readiness to change, self-efficacy, perceived risk, norm estimates, and positive drinking expectancies. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, GMET students demonstrated greater reductions in problem drinking outcomes (drinks per drinking day, hazardous drinking symptoms, and alcohol-related problems). Of the 5 mediators proposed, only self-efficacy emerged as a significant mediator.

摘要

在全国范围内,大学生饮酒者的饮酒率最高,占问题饮酒者的比例最大。群体动机增强疗法(GMET)已被证明可以促进大学生群体中问题饮酒的减少。尽管支持在大学生群体(普通和强制)中使用单次 GMET 的研究正在涌现,但尚无研究评估这种团体干预的潜在有效成分的综合模型。被强制参加大学酒精转移项目的大学生(N=206;88%为白人;63%为男性;M 年龄=18.6)被随机分配到 3 个条件之一:标准护理 2 次“关注酒精问题”教育组(FAC)、单次 GMET 或单次仅含酒精信息的对照组(AI),以评估 5 种假定的中介因素的作用:改变的意愿、自我效能、感知风险、规范估计和积极的饮酒期望。在 3 个月和 6 个月的随访中,GMET 学生在减少问题饮酒结果(饮酒量、危险饮酒症状和与酒精相关的问题)方面表现出更大的效果。在所提出的 5 种中介因素中,只有自我效能感是一个显著的中介因素。

相似文献

6
Feedback-based alcohol interventions for mandated students: an effectiveness study of three modalities.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):411-23. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1786. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
7
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Dec;15(4):373-9. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.373.
8
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Sep;63(5):559-67. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.559.
9
Predictors of short-term change after a brief alcohol intervention for mandated college drinkers.
Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Efficacy as a Mechanism of Behavior Change in Addiction Science and Practice.
Curr Addict Rep. 2025 Dec;12(1). doi: 10.1007/s40429-025-00632-z. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
The indirect effect of negative emotionality via alcohol craving on abstinence self-efficacy among women in alcohol treatment.
Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;132:107347. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107347. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Consumer Health Information Technology in the Prevention of Substance Abuse: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 30;21(1):e11297. doi: 10.2196/11297.
7
Testing Mediators of Reduced Drinking for Veterans in Alcohol Care Management.
Mil Med. 2018 Sep 1;183(9-10):e594-e602. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy024.
8
Do As I Say: Using Communication Role-Plays to Assess Sexual Assertiveness Following an Intervention.
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Dec;43(6):691-698. doi: 10.1177/1090198116630528. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jul;84(7):619-32. doi: 10.1037/a0040275. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
10
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;2015(12):CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
The factor structure of the Reckless Behavior Questionnaire.
J Youth Adolesc. 1992 Jun;21(3):305-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01537020.
5
Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):74-87. doi: 10.1037/a0014281.
6
Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/a0014472.
8
The validity of the desired effects of drinking scale with a late adolescent sample.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Dec;22(4):587-91. doi: 10.1037/a0012970.
9
A natural language screening measure for motivation to change.
Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;33(9):1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.04.018. Epub 2008 May 9.
10
Risky drinking in college changes as fraternity/sorority affiliation changes: a person-environment perspective.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Jun;22(2):219-29. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.219.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验