Suppr超能文献

针对大学生饮酒者的简短动机干预的相对疗效。

Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.

作者信息

Murphy J G, Duchnick J J, Vuchinich R E, Davison J W, Karg R S, Olson A M, Smith A F, Coffey T T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5214, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Dec;15(4):373-9. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.373.

Abstract

The authors evaluated the efficacy of Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS - L. A. Dimeff, J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, & G. A. Marlatt, 1999), a single session of drinking-related feedback intended to reduce heavy drinking and related harm. College student drinkers (N = 99) were assigned to BASICS, an educational intervention, or an assessment-only control group. At 3 months postintervention. there were no overall significant group differences, but heavier drinking BASICS participants showed greater reductions in weekly alcohol consumption and binge drinking than did heavier drinking control and education participants. At 9 months, heavier drinking BASICS participants again showed the largest effect sizes. BASICS participants evaluated the intervention more favorably than did education participants. This study suggests that BASICS may be more efficacious than educational interventions for heavier drinking college students.

摘要

作者评估了大学生简短酒精筛查与干预(BASICS——L.A. 迪梅夫、J.S. 贝尔、D.R. 基夫拉汉和G.A. 马尔拉特,1999年)的效果,这是一次旨在减少酗酒及相关危害的与饮酒相关的反馈环节。大学生饮酒者(N = 99)被分配到BASICS组、教育干预组或仅进行评估的对照组。干预后3个月,总体上各小组之间没有显著差异,但饮酒量较大的BASICS参与者与饮酒量较大的对照组和教育干预组参与者相比,每周饮酒量和暴饮次数的减少幅度更大。在9个月时,饮酒量较大的BASICS参与者再次显示出最大的效应量。BASICS参与者对该干预的评价比教育干预组参与者更积极。这项研究表明,对于饮酒量较大的大学生,BASICS可能比教育干预更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验