Suppr超能文献

针对大学生饮酒者的简短动机干预的相对疗效。

Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.

作者信息

Murphy J G, Duchnick J J, Vuchinich R E, Davison J W, Karg R S, Olson A M, Smith A F, Coffey T T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5214, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Dec;15(4):373-9. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.373.

Abstract

The authors evaluated the efficacy of Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS - L. A. Dimeff, J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, & G. A. Marlatt, 1999), a single session of drinking-related feedback intended to reduce heavy drinking and related harm. College student drinkers (N = 99) were assigned to BASICS, an educational intervention, or an assessment-only control group. At 3 months postintervention. there were no overall significant group differences, but heavier drinking BASICS participants showed greater reductions in weekly alcohol consumption and binge drinking than did heavier drinking control and education participants. At 9 months, heavier drinking BASICS participants again showed the largest effect sizes. BASICS participants evaluated the intervention more favorably than did education participants. This study suggests that BASICS may be more efficacious than educational interventions for heavier drinking college students.

摘要

作者评估了大学生简短酒精筛查与干预(BASICS——L.A. 迪梅夫、J.S. 贝尔、D.R. 基夫拉汉和G.A. 马尔拉特,1999年)的效果,这是一次旨在减少酗酒及相关危害的与饮酒相关的反馈环节。大学生饮酒者(N = 99)被分配到BASICS组、教育干预组或仅进行评估的对照组。干预后3个月,总体上各小组之间没有显著差异,但饮酒量较大的BASICS参与者与饮酒量较大的对照组和教育干预组参与者相比,每周饮酒量和暴饮次数的减少幅度更大。在9个月时,饮酒量较大的BASICS参与者再次显示出最大的效应量。BASICS参与者对该干预的评价比教育干预组参与者更积极。这项研究表明,对于饮酒量较大的大学生,BASICS可能比教育干预更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验