Departments of Clinical Radiology, daggerBiomathematics and Statistics, and double daggerNuclear Medicine, University of Muenster, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2010 Feb;45(2):82-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c443e1.
To determine the impact of slice thickness on semiautomatic lymph node analysis.
Thoracic multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of 46 patients with NSCLC were reconstructed at 1.0-, 3.0-, and 5.0-mm slice thickness. Two radiologists independently determined long and short axis diameter and volume of 299 thoracic lymph nodes by semiautomatic segmentation software. Necessity of manual correction (= relative difference between uncorrected and corrected segmented lymph node volume) and relative interobserver differences were determined. The precision of segmentation was expressed by relative measurement deviations (RMD) from the reference standard (mean of 1.0 mm datasets). Statistical analysis encompassed t test and Bland-Altman plots.
Necessity of manual correction was significantly higher for 5.0 mm than for 3.0 (P = 0.042) or 1.0 mm (P = 0.0012). The RMD for long and short axis diameter were found to be independent of slice thickness, whereas the RMD for lymph node volume significantly (P = 0.021) increased from 4.0% at 1.0 mm (95% CI: 1.0%-3.5%) to 35% at 5.0 mm (95% CI: 10.5%-60.5%). The relative interobserver differences was consistently low for metric and volumetric parameters (eg, volume 2.3%, 95% CI: -7.4%-10.8% at 5.0 mm) with no difference in any of the slice thicknesses (P > 0.064).
Significant deviations in lymph node volume together with excessive manual corrections suggest reconstruction of the data for semiautomatic lymph node assessment at a slice thickness of 1.0 mm but not exceeding 3.0 mm.
确定层厚对半自动淋巴结分析的影响。
对 46 例非小细胞肺癌患者的胸部多层螺旋 CT(MSCT)进行 1.0、3.0 和 5.0mm 层厚重建。两名放射科医生使用半自动分割软件分别独立确定 299 个胸部淋巴结的长轴和短轴直径及体积。确定手动校正的必要性(=未校正和校正后的分割淋巴结体积之间的相对差异)和相对观察者间差异。通过与参考标准(1.0mm 数据集的平均值)的相对测量偏差(RMD)来表示分割的精度。统计分析包括 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 图。
5.0mm 层厚的手动校正必要性明显高于 3.0mm(P=0.042)或 1.0mm(P=0.0012)。长轴和短轴直径的 RMD 与层厚无关,而淋巴结体积的 RMD 显著增加(P=0.021),从 1.0mm 时的 4.0%(95%CI:1.0%-3.5%)增加到 5.0mm 时的 35%(95%CI:10.5%-60.5%)。对于度量和体积参数(例如,5.0mm 时体积为 2.3%,95%CI:-7.4%-10.8%),观察者间的相对差异始终较低,各层厚之间无差异(P>0.064)。
淋巴结体积的显著偏差和过多的手动校正提示在 1.0mm 但不超过 3.0mm 的层厚重建数据以进行半自动淋巴结评估。