Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):617-22. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000600015.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Vickers hardness number (VHN) and the in vitro marginal adaptation of inlay restorations of three hybrid composite resins (Filtek Z250, Opallis and Esthet-X) subjected to two post-cure treatments.
For the microhardness test, three different groups were prepared in accordance with the post-cure treatments: control group (only light cure for 40 s), autoclave group (light cure for 40 s + autoclave for 15 min at 130 masculineC); and microwave group (light cure for 40 s + microwave for 3 min at 450 W). To assess the marginal adaptation, the composite resin was inserted incrementally into a mesial-occlusal-distal cavity brass mold and each increment light-cured for 40 s. A previous reading in micrometers was taken at the cervical wall, using a stereomicroscope magnifying glass equipped with a digital video camera and image-analysis software. Subsequently, the specimens were subjected to the post-cure treatments (autoclave and microwave) and a reading was taken again at the cervical wall. Data were compared using ANOVA for the hardness test, split-plot ANOVA for the adaptation assessment and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. A significance level of 5% was adopted for all analyses.
The post-cure treatments increased the hardness of conventional composites (p<0.001) and the gap values of inlay restorations (p<0.01). Filtek Z250 showed higher hardness (p<0.001) and lower gap values than Opallis and Esthet-X (p<0.05). Gap values did not exceed 90 microm for any of the experimental conditions.
The post-cure treatments increased the VHN and the gap values on the cervical floor of composite resin inlays. Moreover, Filtek Z250 showed the best results, with higher hardness and lower gap values.
本研究旨在评估三种混合复合树脂(Filtek Z250、Opallis 和 Esthet-X)嵌体修复体的维氏硬度值(VHN)和体外边缘适合性,这些修复体经过两种后固化处理。
根据后固化处理,制备了三个不同的微硬度测试组:对照组(仅光固化 40s)、高压蒸汽灭菌组(光固化 40s+130°C 高压蒸汽灭菌 15min)和微波组(光固化 40s+450W 微波 3min)。为了评估边缘适合性,将复合树脂逐步插入近中-颊-远中腔黄铜模具中,每个增量用 40s 的光固化。使用配备数字摄像机和图像分析软件的立体显微镜放大镜在颈壁处进行初始读数。然后,对标本进行后固化处理(高压蒸汽灭菌和微波),并再次在颈壁处进行读数。使用方差分析(ANOVA)比较硬度测试数据,使用分割区组方差分析(split-plot ANOVA)比较适应度评估数据,使用 Tukey 检验进行多重比较。所有分析均采用 5%的显著水平。
后固化处理增加了传统复合材料的硬度(p<0.001)和嵌体修复体的间隙值(p<0.01)。Filtek Z250 的硬度(p<0.001)高于 Opallis 和 Esthet-X,而间隙值(p<0.05)则较低。在任何实验条件下,间隙值均未超过 90μm。
后固化处理增加了复合树脂嵌体颈壁的 VHN 和间隙值。此外,Filtek Z250 的表现最好,硬度较高,间隙值较低。