Suppr超能文献

局部用与口服皮质类固醇治疗后皮肤浓度的比较:重新审视常见炎症性皮肤病的治疗

Comparison of skin concentrations following topical versus oral corticosteroid treatment: reconsidering the treatment of common inflammatory dermatoses.

作者信息

McClain Richard W, Yentzer Brad A, Feldman Steven R

机构信息

Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1071, USA.

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1076-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Topical corticosteroids are often considered to have greater safety and poorer efficacy than oral corticosteroids in treating psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. There are limited data for assessing relative efficacy of topical and systemic corticosteroids, however. The concentration of corticosteroid in skin, adjusted for the relative potency of the active compound, may be a predictor of clinical efficacy and can be estimated for both topical and oral administration.

PURPOSE

To analyze the assumption that oral corticosteroid therapy should be more potent than topical therapy by comparing relative corticosteroid concentrations in the skin expected with topical versus systemic administration.

METHODS

The estimated skin concentration of prednisone following oral dosing was calculated based on data showing 70-100% bioavailability and an even tissue distribution. Data on the concentration of corticosteroids found in skin after topical application were obtained from the literature. The relative potencies of corticosteroid molecules were then used to compare skin concentrations of corticosteroid following topical versus oral treatment.

RESULTS

Data derived from the existing literature demonstrated that hydrocortisone 2.5% ointment, triamcinolone 0.1% ointment, and clobetasol 0.05% foam achieved effective skin concentrations greater than the effective concentration achieved by oral prednisone. Betamethasone 0.1% cream achieved effective concentrations in skin within the range created by oral prednisone.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis was limited by the paucity of data regarding cutaneous concentrations of corticosteroids after topical application, and by the differing experimental designs utilized in the available studies.

CONCLUSION

Most topical corticosteroids have the potential to achieve greater effective drug levels in the superficial layers of skin than those achieved with standard doses of oral prednisone. The apparently greater efficacy of oral corticosteroid therapy may be attributable, in part, to poor patient compliance with topical therapy. Systemic alterations in immune function following oral, but not topical, corticosteroid use may also play a role.

摘要

背景

在治疗银屑病和特应性皮炎时,局部用皮质类固醇通常被认为比口服皮质类固醇安全性更高但疗效更差。然而,评估局部和全身用皮质类固醇相对疗效的数据有限。根据活性化合物的相对效价调整后的皮肤中皮质类固醇浓度,可能是临床疗效的一个预测指标,并且可以针对局部和口服给药进行估算。

目的

通过比较局部与全身给药预期在皮肤中的相对皮质类固醇浓度,分析口服皮质类固醇疗法应比局部疗法更有效的这一假设。

方法

根据显示生物利用度为70 - 100%且组织分布均匀的数据,计算口服给药后泼尼松在皮肤中的估计浓度。从文献中获取局部应用后皮肤中皮质类固醇浓度的数据。然后使用皮质类固醇分子的相对效价来比较局部与口服治疗后皮肤中皮质类固醇的浓度。

结果

现有文献数据表明,2.5%氢化可的松软膏、0.1%曲安奈德软膏和0.05%氯倍他索泡沫剂在皮肤中达到的有效浓度高于口服泼尼松达到的有效浓度。0.1%倍他米松乳膏在皮肤中达到的有效浓度处于口服泼尼松所产生的范围内。

局限性

本分析受到局部应用后皮质类固醇皮肤浓度数据匮乏以及现有研究中所采用的不同实验设计的限制。

结论

大多数局部用皮质类固醇在皮肤表层有可能达到比标准剂量口服泼尼松更高的有效药物水平。口服皮质类固醇疗法明显更高的疗效可能部分归因于患者对局部疗法的依从性差。口服而非局部用皮质类固醇使用后免疫功能的全身改变也可能起作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验