Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Mainz, Medical Center, Augustusplatz 2, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Trials. 2009 Dec 23;10:118. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-118.
Modern radiotherapy plays an important role in therapy of advanced head and neck carcinomas. However, no clinical studies have been published addressing the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with small tumor (pT1, pT2) and concomitant ipsilateral metastasis of a single lymph node (pN1), which would provide a basis for a general treatment recommendation.
METHODS/DESIGN: The present study is a non-blinded, prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). As the primary clinical endpoint, overall-survival in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy vs. patients without adjuvant therapy following curative intended surgery is compared. The aim of the study is to enroll 560 adult males and females for 1:1 randomization to one of the two treatment arms (irradiation/no irradiation). Since patients with small tumor (T1/T2) but singular lymph node metastasis are rare and the amount of patients consenting to randomization is not predictable in advance, all patients rejecting randomization will be treated as preferred and enrolled in a prospective observational study (comprehensive cohort design) after giving informed consent. This observational part of the trial will be performed with maximum consistency to the treatment and observation protocol of the RCT. Because the impact of patient preference for a certain treatment option is not calculable, parallel design of RCT and observational study may provide a maximum of evidence and efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcome. Secondary clinical endpoints are as follows: incidence and time to tumor relapse (locoregional relapse, lymph node involvement and distant metastatic spread), Quality of life as reported by EORTC (QLQ-C30 with H&N 35 module), and time from operation to orofacial rehabilitation. All tumors represent a homogeneous clinical state and therefore additional investigation of protein expression levels within resection specimen may serve for establishment of surrogate parameters of patient outcome.
The inherent challenges of a rare clinical condition (pN1) and two substantially different therapy arms would limit the practicality of a classical randomized study. The concept of a Comprehensive Cohort Design combines the preference of a randomized study, with the option of careful data interpretation within an observational study.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00964977.
现代放疗在治疗晚期头颈部癌方面发挥着重要作用。然而,目前尚无研究报道术后放疗对肿瘤较小(pT1、pT2)且同侧单个淋巴结转移(pN1)的患者的有效性,这将为一般治疗建议提供依据。
方法/设计:本研究为非盲、前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验(RCT)。主要临床终点为接受术后放疗与单纯根治性手术后不接受辅助治疗的患者的总生存率。该研究旨在招募 560 名成年男女,1:1 随机分为两组(放疗/无放疗)。由于肿瘤较小(T1/T2)但仅有单个淋巴结转移的患者较为罕见,且同意随机分组的患者数量事先无法预测,因此所有拒绝随机分组的患者将作为首选,并在知情同意后纳入前瞻性观察研究(综合队列设计)。该试验的观察部分将与 RCT 的治疗和观察方案保持最大一致性。由于无法计算患者对特定治疗方案的偏好的影响,因此 RCT 和观察研究的平行设计可能为评估治疗结果提供最大的证据和疗效。次要临床终点如下:肿瘤复发的发生率和时间(局部区域复发、淋巴结累及和远处转移)、EORTC(QLQ-C30 加 H&N 35 模块)报告的生活质量,以及从手术到口腔康复的时间。所有肿瘤均代表一种同质的临床状态,因此,对切除标本内蛋白表达水平的进一步研究可能有助于建立患者预后的替代参数。
罕见临床情况(pN1)和两种截然不同的治疗方法的内在挑战将限制经典随机研究的实用性。综合队列设计的概念结合了随机研究的偏好和观察研究中仔细数据解释的选项。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00964977。