Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Jan;44(1):43-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M429. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
In 2006, there were over 350,000 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving dialysis therapy. Studies have found that hemoglobin concentrations are often low among dialysis patients after hospital discharge, yet little is known about inpatient anemia treatment.
To characterize hospitalizations among patients with ESRD on dialysis, specifically, inpatient utilization of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy.
A cross-sectional, retrospective study of claims data from 5 commercial health plans for the years 2004-2006 was conducted. Inclusion criteria included 1 or more ESRD-specific International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition (ICD-9) codes, 3 or more ESRD-specific Current Procedural Terminology/Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (CPT/HCPCS) procedures on different days, or 3 or more dialysis ICD-9 codes or CPT/HCPCS dialysis procedures on separate days. ESRD patient and hospital characteristics were outlined.
ESRD patients were hospitalized an average of 1.8 times in both 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. The mean +/- SD hospital length of stay (LOS) was 13.3 +/- 20.5 and 12.8 +/- 19.0 days for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, respectively. For each year, LOS greater than 7 days occurred in 44% of hospitalizations. Many of these patients were admitted for kidney-related comorbidities and ultimately received procedures and services relevant to dialysis care. For each year, ESA utilization was 13% in year 1 and 11% in year 2 across any LOS. For ESRD patients with a 4- to 7-day LOS (the most common LOS), less than 20% received ESA treatment. ESA utilization increased correspondingly with longer hospital LOS (p < 0.001).
Although ESRD patients are commonly hospitalized and claims recognize that kidney-related conditions exist, the utilization of ESAs is low.
2006 年,有超过 35 万名终末期肾病(ESRD)患者接受透析治疗。研究发现,透析患者出院后血红蛋白浓度往往较低,但对于住院患者贫血的治疗却知之甚少。
描述透析患者的住院情况,特别是住院患者使用红细胞生成刺激剂(ESA)治疗的情况。
对 2004 年至 2006 年 5 家商业健康计划的索赔数据进行了一项横断面、回顾性研究。纳入标准包括 1 个或多个 ESRD 特定的国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9)代码、3 个或更多 ESRD 特定的当前程序术语/医疗保健通用程序编码系统(CPT/HCPCS)程序在不同的日子,或 3 个或更多的透析 ICD-9 代码或 CPT/HCPCS 透析程序在不同的日子。概述了 ESRD 患者和医院的特征。
ESRD 患者在 2004-2005 年和 2005-2006 年的平均住院次数分别为 1.8 次。平均 +/- SD 住院时间(LOS)分别为 13.3 +/- 20.5 和 12.8 +/- 19.0 天。对于每一年,超过 7 天的 LOS 发生在 44%的住院患者中。这些患者中有许多是因肾脏相关并发症而入院的,最终接受了与透析护理相关的程序和服务。对于每一年,在任何 LOS 下,ESAs 的使用在第一年为 13%,在第二年为 11%。对于 LOS 为 4 至 7 天(最常见的 LOS)的 ESRD 患者,不到 20%的患者接受了 ESA 治疗。ESA 的使用随着住院 LOS 的延长而相应增加(p < 0.001)。
尽管 ESRD 患者经常住院,并且索赔表明存在与肾脏相关的疾病,但 ESAs 的使用量很低。