Hudson Robert B
School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2010 Jan;53(1):3-20. doi: 10.1080/01634370903425832.
A new chapter in health policy presents both challenges and opportunities for aging policy analysts and advocates concerned with long-term care. Millions of long-term care recipients and providers live today in a pubic policy netherworld, one principally associated with Medicaid. I suggest here that moving policy forward will entail three key steps: (a) to overcome structural lag in key home and community-based care (HCBC) policy arenas; (b) to reverse a contemporary pattern of risk-shifting from institutions to individuals; and (c) to inform and empower caregivers to have their own pressing needs recognized. Recent developments in Washington provide new optimism on these fronts. Voluntary long-term care and community-based care (LTC/HCBC) proposals are on the table within the broad context of health care reform. Whether they remain will be, in large, part a function of how far we have moved along the fronts described: modernizing policies, recognizing risks, and activating neglected policy constituencies.
卫生政策的新篇章给关注长期护理的老龄政策分析人士和倡导者带来了挑战与机遇。如今,数百万长期护理接受者和提供者生活在公共政策的边缘地带,这一地带主要与医疗补助计划相关。我在此提出,推动政策前进需要三个关键步骤:(a) 克服关键的居家和社区照护(HCBC)政策领域的结构性滞后;(b) 扭转当前从机构向个人风险转移的模式;(c) 为照护者提供信息并赋予其权力,使其紧迫需求得到认可。华盛顿最近的事态发展在这些方面带来了新的乐观情绪。在医疗保健改革的大背景下,自愿长期护理和基于社区的照护(LTC/HCBC)提议已摆在桌面上。这些提议能否保留,很大程度上取决于我们在上述方面取得了多大进展:使政策现代化、认识风险以及激活被忽视的政策支持者群体。