Suppr超能文献

不同黏结剂黏固于天然牙及种植体基牙的 209 颗全瓷单冠 6 年临床评价:回顾性研究。

Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.

机构信息

University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):184-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00251.x. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Procera AllCeram™ system (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) is a valid alternative to metal-ceramic restorations. However, limited long-term data of its use for single crowns on natural and implant-supported abutments are available.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed at evaluating the clinical performances of Procera AllCeram single crowns in both anterior and posterior regions of the oral cavity either on natural tooth or implant abutments over a period of 6 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred nine single crowns were fabricated and used in 112 patients. Zinc phosphate and resin luting agents were used to cement the restorations. The crowns were evaluated according to the California Dental Association's quality assessment system.

RESULTS

Three crowns were lost at follow-up. Of the 206 restorations, which completed the 6-year follow-up, 9 crowns were affected by mechanical complications and 7 crowns failed. All surviving crowns were ranked as either excellent or acceptable. Cumulative survival and success rates of 95.2 and 90.9%, respectively, were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present study, Procera AllCeram crowns proved to be a reliable clinical option to restore both anterior and posterior missing teeth either on natural or implant abutments. The resin cement used in the present study performed better than the zinc phosphate luting agent.

摘要

背景

Procera AllCeram™ 系统(瑞典哥德堡 Nobel Biocare AB)是金属-陶瓷修复体的有效替代品。然而,关于其用于天然牙和种植体支持基牙的单冠的长期临床效果的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估 Procera AllCeram 单冠在前牙和后牙区,无论是在天然牙基牙还是种植体基牙上,6 年的临床效果。

材料和方法

制作了 209 个单冠,并在 112 名患者中使用。使用锌磷酸盐和树脂水门汀黏固修复体。根据加利福尼亚牙科协会的质量评估系统对冠进行评估。

结果

随访时有 3 个冠脱落。在完成 6 年随访的 206 个修复体中,有 9 个冠出现机械并发症,7 个冠失败。所有存活的冠均评为优秀或可接受。分别记录了 95.2%和 90.9%的累积生存率和成功率。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,Procera AllCeram 冠被证明是一种可靠的临床选择,可用于修复前牙和后牙缺失,无论是在天然牙基牙还是种植体基牙上。本研究中使用的树脂水门汀的性能优于锌磷酸盐黏固剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验