Suppr超能文献

一种适当性评估工具能否用于为白内障摘除手术等候名单上的患者进行优先排序?

Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction?

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.022. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a system originally developed to ascertain the appropriateness of cataract intervention may also be used to prioritize patients on cataract extraction waiting lists.

METHODS

The IRYSS-appropriateness of indication for cataract surgery tool and the IRYSS-Cataract Priority Score were applied to a sample of 5448 patients consecutively placed on waiting lists for cataract surgery. Clinical data were gathered by ophthalmologists, and patients self-completed the Visual Function Index-14. The general linear model (GLM) was used to assign scores to the categories of the appropriateness and priority criteria. The relationship between both systems was evaluated by correlating scores. To assess the validity of the new appropriateness and priority scores, correlations with visual acuity (VA) and visual function were calculated.

RESULTS

The GLM method generated highly similar scores for both appropriateness and prioritization systems. The correlation between scores was very strong (r=0.96). The appropriateness scoring system correlated 0.29 with VA and 0.21 with gain in visual function. The priority system correlated -0.54 with VA and -0.28 with preintervention visual function.

CONCLUSIONS

The new appropriateness scoring system strongly correlates with the priority scoring system. This easy-to-use appropriateness rating could serve as a tool for simultaneously assessing the appropriateness of cataract surgery and assigning priority.

摘要

目的

确定最初用于确定白内障干预措施适宜性的系统是否也可用于对白内障摘除等候名单上的患者进行优先排序。

方法

IRYSS-白内障手术适应证工具和 IRYSS-白内障优先评分应用于连续列入白内障手术等候名单的 5448 例患者。眼科医生收集临床数据,患者自我完成视觉功能指数-14。采用一般线性模型(GLM)为适宜性和优先级标准的类别分配分数。通过相关分数评估两个系统之间的关系。为了评估新的适宜性和优先级评分的有效性,计算了与视力(VA)和视觉功能的相关性。

结果

GLM 方法为两个适宜性和优先级系统生成了高度相似的分数。评分之间的相关性非常强(r=0.96)。适宜性评分系统与 VA 相关 0.29,与视觉功能增益相关 0.21。优先级系统与 VA 相关-0.54,与术前视觉功能相关-0.28。

结论

新的适宜性评分系统与优先级评分系统密切相关。这种易于使用的适宜性评分可作为同时评估白内障手术适宜性和分配优先级的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验