• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性和老年人中冠心病循证治疗的使用趋势:来自“遵循指南”质量改进项目的发现

Trends in the use of evidence-based treatments for coronary artery disease among women and the elderly: findings from the get with the guidelines quality-improvement program.

作者信息

Lewis William R, Ellrodt A Gray, Peterson Eric, Hernandez Adrian F, LaBresh Kenneth A, Cannon Christopher P, Pan Wenqin, Fonarow Gregg C

机构信息

MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-1998, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):633-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.824763. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.824763
PMID:20031902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant disparities have been reported in the application of evidence-based guidelines in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women and the elderly. We hypothesized that participation in a quality-improvement program could improve care for all patients and thus narrow treatment gaps over time.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Treatment of 237 225 patients hospitalized with CAD was evaluated in the Get With the Guidelines-CAD program from 2002 to 2007. Six quality measures were evaluated in eligible patients without contraindications: aspirin on admission and discharge, beta-blockers use at discharge, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist use, lipid-lowering medication use, and tobacco cessation counseling along with other care metrics. Over time, composite adherence on these 6 measures increased from 86.5% to 97.4% (+10.9%) in men and 84.8% to 96.2% (+11.4%) in women. There was a slight difference in composite adherence by sex that remained significant over time (P<0.0001), but this was confined to patients <75 years. Composite adherence in younger patients (<75 years) increased from 87.1% to 97.7% (+10.6%) and from 83.0% to 95.1% (+12.1%) in the elderly (>or=75 years) over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitals participating in Get With the Guidelines-CAD, guideline adherence has improved substantially over time for both women and men and younger and older CAD patients, with only slight age and sex differences in some measures persisting.

摘要

背景

据报道,在冠心病(CAD)治疗中基于证据的指南应用方面,女性和老年人存在显著差异。我们假设参与质量改进计划可以改善所有患者的治疗,从而随着时间的推移缩小治疗差距。

方法与结果

2002年至2007年期间,在“遵循指南-冠心病”计划中对237225例因CAD住院的患者的治疗情况进行了评估。对符合条件且无禁忌症的患者评估了六项质量指标:入院和出院时使用阿司匹林、出院时使用β受体阻滞剂、使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂、使用降脂药物、戒烟咨询以及其他护理指标。随着时间的推移,男性在这六项指标上的综合依从率从86.5%提高到97.4%(提高了10.9%),女性从84.8%提高到96.2%(提高了11.4%)。按性别划分的综合依从率存在细微差异,且随着时间的推移仍然显著(P<0.0001),但这仅限于75岁以下的患者。随着时间的推移,年轻患者(<75岁)的综合依从率从87.1%提高到97.7%(提高了10.6%),老年患者(≥75岁)从83.0%提高到95.1%(提高了12.1%)。

结论

在参与“遵循指南-冠心病”计划的医院中,随着时间的推移,男性和女性以及年轻和老年CAD患者对指南的依从性都有了显著提高,某些指标仅存在细微的年龄和性别差异。

相似文献

1
Trends in the use of evidence-based treatments for coronary artery disease among women and the elderly: findings from the get with the guidelines quality-improvement program.女性和老年人中冠心病循证治疗的使用趋势:来自“遵循指南”质量改进项目的发现
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):633-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.824763. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
2
Recent trends in the care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE initiative.非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者护理的近期趋势:来自CRUSADE倡议的见解
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 9;166(18):2027-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.18.2027.
3
Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program.通过“遵循指南”项目改善住院冠心病患者的治疗。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2007 Sep;6(3):98-105. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31812da7ed.
4
Utilization of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Australian practice.澳大利亚实践中基于证据的疗法在急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防中的应用。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Dec;33(6):591-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00950.x.
5
Quality of care for acute coronary syndrome patients with known atherosclerotic disease: results from the Get With the Guidelines Program.已知患有动脉粥样硬化疾病的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的护理质量:来自“遵循指南”项目的结果。
Circulation. 2009 Aug 18;120(7):560-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.877092. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
6
Are quality improvements associated with the Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) program sustained over time? A longitudinal comparison of GWTG-CAD hospitals versus non-GWTG-CAD hospitals.质量改进是否与 Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease(GWTG-CAD)计划有关?GWTG-CAD 医院与非 GWTG-CAD 医院的纵向比较。
Am Heart J. 2010 Feb;159(2):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.002.
7
Quality of care and in-hospital outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease in rural and urban hospitals (from Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease Program).农村和城市医院冠心病患者的护理质量和院内结局(来自 Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease 项目)。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan 15;105(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
8
Weekend/holiday versus weekday hospital discharge and guideline adherence (from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines--Coronary Artery Disease database).周末/节假日与工作日的医院出院情况及指南依从性(源自美国心脏协会的“遵循指南——冠状动脉疾病”数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.053. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
9
Enhancing quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: shifting the focus of improvement from key indicators to process of care and tool use: the American College of Cardiology Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice Project in Michigan: Flint and Saginaw Expansion.提高急性心肌梗死的护理质量:将改进重点从关键指标转向护理过程和工具使用——美国心脏病学会急性心肌梗死指南在密歇根州实践项目:弗林特和萨吉诺扩展项目
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 16;43(12):2166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.067.
10
Atherosclerosis secondary prevention performance measures after coronary bypass graft surgery compared with percutaneous catheter intervention and nonintervention patients in the Get With the Guidelines database.在“遵循指南”数据库中,冠状动脉搭桥手术后动脉粥样硬化二级预防性能指标与经皮导管介入治疗及未干预患者的比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I207-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681247.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in guideline adherence for coronary angiography in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome in Germany: insights from the ENLIGHT-KHK trial.德国疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉造影指南依从性的性别差异:来自ENLIGHT-KHK试验的见解
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02655-y.
2
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks.心源性休克:方案、团队、中心及网络
US Cardiol. 2021 Oct 20;15:e18. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
3
Cardiovascular Statistics from the Good Practices in Cardiology Program - Data from a Brazilian Tertiary Public Hospital.
心血管统计数据来自心脏病学计划的良好实践 - 巴西三级公立医院的数据。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Feb 27;120(2):e20220247. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220247. eCollection 2023.
4
Optimal medical therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients with coronary artery disease.高龄冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的最佳药物治疗
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2022 Nov 30;16:200162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2022.200162. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Five years of a comprehensive ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol and its association with sex disparities.一项为期五年的ST段抬高型心肌梗死综合方案及其与性别差异的关联。
Eur Heart J Open. 2021 Aug 20;1(3):oeab011. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeab011. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Passive Prescription of Secondary Prevention Medical Therapy during Index Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction Is Prevalent and Associated with Adverse Clinical Outcomes.急性心肌梗死住院期间被动开具二级预防药物治疗的处方较为普遍,且与不良临床结局相关。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 23;2021:9543912. doi: 10.1155/2021/9543912. eCollection 2021.
7
The presentation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the emergency department: Signs and symptoms in an unsuspecting population.急诊科自发性冠状动脉夹层的表现:在未被怀疑的人群中的症状和体征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;29(4):423-428. doi: 10.1111/acem.14426. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
8
Update: Gender differences in CABG outcomes-Have we bridged the gap?更新:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)结局中的性别差异——我们是否已经弥合了差距?
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0255170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255170. eCollection 2021.
9
Gender disparities in clinical practice: are there any solutions? Scoping review of interventions to overcome or reduce gender bias in clinical practice.临床实践中的性别差异:有解决方案吗?对克服或减少临床实践中性别偏见的干预措施的范围审查。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 22;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01283-4.
10
Age, knowledge, preferences, and risk tolerance for invasive cardiac care.年龄、知识、偏好和对侵入性心脏治疗的风险承受能力。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jan;219:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Oct 23.