Suppr超能文献

腹壁重建中异种移植生物补片植入相关的主要并发症。

Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction.

作者信息

Harth Karem C, Rosen Michael J

机构信息

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2009 Dec;16(4):324-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350609353609. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited research for xenograft biologic mesh performance in the setting of infection despite widespread use and significant associated costs.

DESIGN

The authors retrospectively reviewed an FDA database for reported xenograft adverse events (AEs). All meshes were used in the setting of abdominal wall reconstruction from 1997 to 2008.

RESULTS

The authors identified 150 AEs. Permacol and Collamend comprised 75% (n = 112) of reported cases. Main AEs included acute mechanical failure (42%; n = 63), mesh disintegration (32%; n = 48), and poor mesh integration (13%; n = 20); 80% of cases were described as infected, and nearly 90% of AEs required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Major complications are reported to the FDA for xenograft biologic meshes. Cross-linked meshes had the most AE reports to the FDA. The intrinsic properties of meshes and how they relate to infection-related outcomes are poorly understood. The findings from this FDA database review point toward a need to carefully evaluate these products.

摘要

背景

尽管异种移植生物补片被广泛使用且相关成本高昂,但关于其在感染情况下性能的研究有限。

设计

作者回顾性分析了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)数据库中报告的异种移植不良事件(AE)。所有补片均于1997年至2008年用于腹壁重建。

结果

作者识别出150例不良事件。Permacol和Collamend占报告病例的75%(n = 112)。主要不良事件包括急性机械故障(42%;n = 63)、补片崩解(32%;n = 48)和补片整合不良(13%;n = 20);80%的病例被描述为感染,近90%的不良事件需要再次手术。

结论

异种移植生物补片的主要并发症已上报至FDA。交联补片向FDA报告的不良事件最多。补片的内在特性及其与感染相关结果的关系尚不清楚。此次FDA数据库审查结果表明需要仔细评估这些产品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验