Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Anticancer Res. 2009 Nov;29(11):4765-70.
In 1982, Wirsching et al. introduced a psychosocial risk scale (PRS) for psychological identification of breast cancer patients before biopsy. To our knowledge, the associations between PRS and risk of breast cancer are rarely considered together in a prospective study.
This study is an extension of the Kuopio Breast Cancer Study. Women with breast symptoms were referred by physicians to the Kuopio University Hospital (Finland) and were asked to participate in this study. These women (n=115) were interviewed, and all study variables were obtained before any diagnostic procedures were carried out, so neither the investigator nor the participants knew the final diagnosis of breast symptoms at the time of the interview. The research method used was the semistructured in-depth interview method. The investigator used the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) to evaluate the depression of the study participants. All participants were also asked to complete standardized questionnaires (Beck depression inventory and Spielberger trait inventory). The investigator estimated the PRS using a 3-point scale: grade I, low psychosocial risk; grade II, mild/moderate psychosocial risk; grade III, high psychosocial risk for breast cancer.
The clinical examination and biopsy showed breast cancer in 34 patients, benign breast disease in 53 patients, and 28 individuals were shown to be healthy (HSS). The results indicated that breast cancer patients used more idealization of childhood, and motherhood (p=0.04) than did the other groups. PRS was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk (p=0.05).
The results of this study support a moderate association between Wirsching et al.'s PRS score and breast cancer risk. However, the biological explanation for such an association is unclear and the exact effects of psychological factors on the various hormones relevant to development of breast cancer are at present poorly defined.
1982 年,Wirsching 等人引入了一种心理社会风险量表(PRS),用于在活检前对乳腺癌患者进行心理识别。据我们所知,在前瞻性研究中,PRS 与乳腺癌风险之间的关联很少被同时考虑。
本研究是库奥皮奥乳腺癌研究的延伸。有乳房症状的女性由医生转诊到库奥皮奥大学医院(芬兰),并被邀请参加这项研究。这些女性(n=115)接受了访谈,所有研究变量都是在进行任何诊断程序之前获得的,因此在访谈时,调查员和参与者都不知道乳房症状的最终诊断。研究方法采用半结构化深入访谈法。调查员使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估研究参与者的抑郁程度。所有参与者还被要求完成标准化问卷(贝克抑郁量表和斯皮尔伯格特质问卷)。调查员使用 3 分制评估 PRS:I 级,低心理社会风险;II 级,轻度/中度心理社会风险;III 级,乳腺癌的高心理社会风险。
临床检查和活检显示 34 例患者患有乳腺癌,53 例患者患有良性乳腺疾病,28 例患者健康(HSS)。结果表明,乳腺癌患者比其他组更理想化童年和母性(p=0.04)。PRS 与乳腺癌风险显著相关(p=0.05)。
本研究结果支持 Wirsching 等人的 PRS 评分与乳腺癌风险之间存在中度关联。然而,这种关联的生物学解释尚不清楚,目前对心理因素对与乳腺癌发展相关的各种激素的确切影响还知之甚少。