Shahi Shahriar, Rahimi Saeed, Hasan Maryam, Shiezadeh Vahab, Abdolrahimi Majid
Department of Endodontics, Tabriz Dental School, Tabriz University (Medical Sciences), Tabriz, Iran.
J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):601-6. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.601.
The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of gray mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA), white MTA (WMTA), and both white and gray Portland cement as furcation perforation repair materials. A total of 120 human mandibular first molars were used. After root canal obturation and preparation of furcal perforations the specimens were randomly divided into four groups of 25 teeth each. In groups A, B, C, and D furcation perforations were filled with WMTA, GMTA, white Portland cement, and type II Portland cement, respectively. Ten teeth were used as positive controls with no filling materials in the perforations and 10 teeth with complete coverage with two layers of nail varnish were used as negative controls. A protein leakage model utilizing 22% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used for evaluation. Leakage was noted when color conversion of the protein reagent was observed. The controls behaved as expected. Leakage was found in the samples from group A (WMTA), group B (GMTA), and in the two other groups (white and gray Portland cement). There were no statistically significant differences between GMTA and WMTA or white and gray Portland cement, but significant differences were observed between the MTA groups and the Portland cement groups. It was concluded that Portland cements have better sealing ability than MTA, and can be recommended for repair of furcation perforation if the present results are supported by other in vivo and in vitro studies.
本研究的目的是比较灰色矿物三氧化物凝聚体(GMTA)、白色MTA(WMTA)以及白色和灰色波特兰水泥作为根分叉穿孔修复材料的封闭能力。总共使用了120颗人类下颌第一磨牙。在进行根管充填和制备根分叉穿孔后,将标本随机分为四组,每组25颗牙齿。在A、B、C和D组中,根分叉穿孔分别用WMTA、GMTA、白色波特兰水泥和II型波特兰水泥充填。10颗牙齿用作阳性对照,穿孔处不填充材料,10颗用两层指甲油完全覆盖的牙齿用作阴性对照。采用利用22%牛血清白蛋白(BSA)的蛋白质渗漏模型进行评估。当观察到蛋白质试剂颜色转变时记录渗漏情况。对照组表现符合预期。在A组(WMTA)、B组(GMTA)以及其他两组(白色和灰色波特兰水泥)的样本中均发现渗漏。GMTA与WMTA之间或白色与灰色波特兰水泥之间无统计学显著差异,但MTA组与波特兰水泥组之间观察到显著差异。得出的结论是,波特兰水泥比MTA具有更好的封闭能力,如果本研究结果得到其他体内和体外研究的支持,可推荐用于根分叉穿孔的修复。