Jeans Kelly A, Karol Lori A
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, 2222 Welborn St., Dallas, TX 75219, USA.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181c6c4de.
Recent trends have led to interest in nonoperative treatments for clubfoot (Ponseti casting and French Physiotherapy). Current studies show good sagittal kinematic motion after both treatments in the young child, but changes in plantar loading after these treatments have not yet been reported.
Pedobarograph data were collected with the Emed System on 151 clubfeet, treated with either Cast (79 feet) or physiotherapy (PT, 72 feet), at the age of 2 years. Medial and lateral differences in plantar pressures, contact area, and contact time, were assessed in the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. An assessment of forefoot adductus was made, while the center of the pressure line was tracked both medially and laterally. Seventeen controls were used for comparison.
When comparing Cast feet with PT feet, most differences in plantar pressures were found in the hindfoot and medial midfoot. Peak pressure, maximum force, and pressure time integral were all found to be decreased in the medial hindfoot after PT compared with casting. Maximum force was also less in the lateral hindfoot and peak pressure was less in the medial midfoot for the PT feet compared with the Cast feet. When compared with controls, both Cast and PT feet had increased pressure, force, contact time, contact area, and pressure time integral in the lateral midfoot, whereas the same measures were all significantly decreased in the first metatarsal region. Forefoot adductus was present in both groups compared with controls. The center of the pressure line was significantly displaced to the lateral side of the foot in both groups; however, when assessing medial displacement, only the PT feet had significantly less medial distribution compared with control feet.
Pedobarography illustrates residual pressure differences during gait in children with nonoperatively treated clubfeet. These data provide a more detailed description of dynamic foot loading and residual deformity than sagittal plane kinematics alone.
最近的趋势引发了人们对马蹄内翻足非手术治疗方法(庞塞蒂石膏固定法和法国物理疗法)的兴趣。目前的研究表明,这两种治疗方法在幼儿中均能产生良好的矢状面运动学效果,但这些治疗后足底负荷的变化尚未见报道。
使用Emed系统收集了151例马蹄内翻足在2岁时接受石膏固定(79足)或物理治疗(PT,72足)的数据。评估了后足、中足和前足的足底压力、接触面积和接触时间的内外侧差异。对前足内收进行了评估,同时追踪压力线的中心在内侧和外侧的情况。使用17名对照者进行比较。
将接受石膏固定的足与接受PT治疗的足进行比较时,足底压力的大多数差异出现在后足和中足内侧。与石膏固定相比,PT治疗后后足内侧的峰值压力、最大力和压力时间积分均降低。与接受石膏固定的足相比,接受PT治疗的足后足外侧的最大力也较小,中足内侧的峰值压力也较小。与对照组相比,接受石膏固定和PT治疗的足在中足外侧的压力、力、接触时间、接触面积和压力时间积分均增加,而在第一跖骨区域,相同的测量值均显著降低。与对照组相比,两组均存在前足内收。两组压力线的中心均明显向足的外侧移位;然而,在评估内侧移位时,只有接受PT治疗的足与对照足相比内侧分布明显较少。
足底压力测量法显示了非手术治疗的马蹄内翻足儿童在步态过程中残留的压力差异。这些数据比单独的矢状面运动学更详细地描述了动态足部负荷和残留畸形。