Suppr超能文献

测量注意力缺陷/多动障碍中哌甲酯的反应:基于实验室课堂的测量方法与家长评分有何关联?

Measuring methylphenidate response in attention-deficit/hyperactvity disorder: how are laboratory classroom-based measures related to parent ratings?

作者信息

Sonuga-Barke Edmund J S, Coghill David, DeBacker Marc, Swanson James

机构信息

Institute for Disorders of Impulse and Attention, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2009 Dec;19(6):691-8. doi: 10.1089/cap.2009.0027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methylphenidate (MPH) is an efficacious and normally well-tolerated treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although treatment effects are usually assessed using parent-rating scales, these can be supplemented by more objective methods. Here we examine the associations between ratings and one such method, assessments made across the day in the laboratory classroom.

METHOD

Comparison of Methylphenidates in the Analog Classroom Setting (COMACS) was made in a large (n = 184) placebo-controlled trial comparing Equasym XL/Metadate CD, Concerta, and placebo (PLA) using a Laboratory School protocol. Therapeutic effects were measured using direct observation, scores on a simple math productivity task and parent ratings.

RESULTS

Treatment effects were observed on all measures. Laboratory measures were correlated with each other, most strongly between Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale (SKAMP) inattention and Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP). Parental ratings were correlated with classroom measures during the main morning period (1.5-4.5 hours after dosing) and to a lesser extent in the afternoon (6.0-7.5 hours after dosing), but not, by and large, immediately after dosing or in the evening. The morning correlations seemed stronger for female than for male participants.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that parental ratings and direct observations tap different aspects of MPH response and that both may be required for comprehensive assessment.

摘要

背景

哌甲酯(MPH)是治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一种有效且通常耐受性良好的药物。虽然治疗效果通常使用家长评定量表进行评估,但这些评估可以通过更客观的方法加以补充。在此,我们研究了评定与其中一种方法(即在实验室教室中进行的全天评估)之间的关联。

方法

在一项大型(n = 184)安慰剂对照试验中,采用实验室学校方案,对Equasym XL/Metadate CD、康纳达和安慰剂(PLA)进行了模拟教室环境下的哌甲酯比较(COMACS)。使用直接观察、一项简单数学生产力任务的得分以及家长评定来测量治疗效果。

结果

在所有测量指标上均观察到治疗效果。实验室测量指标之间相互关联,其中斯旺森、科特金、阿格勒、M - 弗林和佩勒姆量表(SKAMP)注意力不集中与永久绩效测量指标(PERMP)之间的相关性最强。家长评定在给药后的主要上午时段(给药后1.5 - 4.5小时)与课堂测量指标相关,下午(给药后6.0 - 7.5小时)相关性较弱,但总体而言,给药后即刻或晚上则无相关性。上午的相关性在女性参与者中似乎比男性参与者更强。

讨论

结果表明,家长评定和直接观察反映了MPH反应的不同方面,全面评估可能需要二者兼备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验