Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 130 Desoto Street, Crabtree A710, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Chem Biol Interact. 2010 Mar 19;184(1-2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.12.021. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
There is a long standing issue concerning the strength of evidence relating benzene to lymphocytic neoplasms. Because benzene is a known cause of human acute myelogenous leukemia there has been little reason for organizations such as the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) or the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) to perform standard hazard identification reviews of benzene as a possible cause of other cancers such as lymphomas. Increased understanding of underlying mechanisms of carcinogenesis, as is reflected in the greater scope given to mechanistic evidence in assigning overall sufficiency of evidence for carcinogenicity by both IARC and NTP, suggests that the evidence supporting benzene as a cause of lymphoma likely has passed the threshold required for being listed as a known causal relationship. A broad range of genotoxic effects in the lymphocytes of benzene-exposed workers has been well documented, as has the role of chromosomal effects in carcinogenesis. There is also increasing evidence of a close relationship between lymphoid tumors and the types of myeloid tumors known to be caused by benzene. This includes the not infrequent finding of biphenotypic lineage as well as the formation of lymphoid as well as myeloid leukemias following chemotherapy. Studies of the mechanism of benzene toxicity are consistent with a relatively non-specific mechanism capable of producing multiple chromosomal changes, and there is evidence that the early hematopoietic stem cell, which is believed to be targeted by benzene in causing myeloid cancers, is also the progenitor of lymphocytic cell types. Furthermore, the classification of lymphomas has evolved so that non-Hodgkin lymphoma now includes such formerly distinct disorders as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma, and there is less of a distinction between leukemia and non-leukemia forms of lymphoma.
长期以来,苯与淋巴细胞肿瘤之间的关联强度一直存在争议。由于苯是已知的人类急性髓细胞白血病的病因,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)或美国国家毒理学计划(NTP)等组织几乎没有理由对苯作为其他癌症(如淋巴瘤)的潜在病因进行标准的危害识别审查。对致癌机制的深入了解,反映在 IARC 和 NTP 在评估致癌性的总体充分性证据时,赋予机制证据更大的范围,这表明支持苯是淋巴瘤病因的证据很可能已经超过了被列为已知因果关系的要求门槛。苯暴露工人的淋巴细胞中广泛存在遗传毒性效应,染色体效应在致癌作用中的作用也已得到充分证实。越来越多的证据表明,淋巴细胞肿瘤与已知由苯引起的髓样肿瘤类型之间存在密切关系。这包括双表型谱系的常见发现,以及在化疗后形成的淋巴样和髓样白血病。苯毒性机制的研究与一种相对非特异性的机制一致,这种机制能够产生多种染色体变化,并且有证据表明,早期造血干细胞是苯引起髓样癌的靶点,也是淋巴细胞类型的祖细胞。此外,淋巴瘤的分类已经发展,现在非霍奇金淋巴瘤包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病和多发性骨髓瘤等以前不同的疾病,白血病和非白血病形式的淋巴瘤之间的区别也越来越小。