Department of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3518 5th Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15261, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
To minimize absenteeism resulting from influenza, employers frequently offer on-site influenza vaccination to employees. Yet the level of uptake of vaccine is low among working adults. This study was designed to increase workplace influenza vaccination rates by offering both a choice of intranasal (LAIV) and injectable (TIV) influenza vaccines to eligible employees, and an incentive for being vaccinated, and by increasing awareness of the vaccine clinic.
This study used a stratified randomized cluster trial.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 12,222 employees in 53 U.S. companies with previous influenza vaccine clinics were examined.
Control sites advertised and offered vaccine clinics as previously done. Choice sites offered LAIV or TIV and maintained their previous advertising level but promoted the choice of vaccines. Choice Plus sites increased advertising and promoted and offered a choice of vaccines and a nominal incentive.
These included vaccination rates among eligible employees. Hierarchic linear modeling (HLM) was used to determine factors associated with vaccination.
The overall vaccination rate increased from 39% in 2007-2008 to 46% in 2008-2009 (p<0.001). The difference in vaccination rates for LAIV was 6.5% for Choice versus Control and 9.9% for Choice Plus versus Control (both p<0.001). Rates of TIV increased by 15.9 percentage points in the Choice Plus arm versus Control for workers aged > or =50 years (p=0.024). Rates of TIV did not change in workers aged 18-49 years in either intervention arm or in workers aged > or =50 years in the Choice arm. In HLM analyses, factors significantly associated with increased vaccination were older age, female gender, previous company vaccination rate, and the Choice Plus intervention.
An incentive for vaccination, an intensified advertising campaign, and offering a choice of influenza vaccines improved vaccination rates in the workplace.
为了将因流感导致的旷工人数降至最低,雇主经常为员工提供现场流感疫苗接种。然而,在职成年人中疫苗接种率仍然较低。本研究旨在通过向符合条件的员工提供鼻内(LAIV)和注射(TIV)流感疫苗的选择,并为接种疫苗提供激励,并通过提高对疫苗接种诊所的认识,来提高工作场所的流感疫苗接种率。
本研究采用分层随机分组试验。
地点/参与者:共检查了 53 家美国公司的 12222 名有过流感疫苗接种诊所的员工。
对照点按照以往的做法宣传和提供疫苗接种诊所。选择点提供 LAIV 或 TIV,并保持以往的广告水平,但宣传疫苗的选择。选择加点增加广告宣传,并提供疫苗选择和象征性激励。
包括符合条件的员工的疫苗接种率。采用层次线性模型(HLM)确定与疫苗接种相关的因素。
整体疫苗接种率从 2007-2008 年的 39%上升到 2008-2009 年的 46%(p<0.001)。LAIV 的接种率差异为选择组与对照组之间为 6.5%,选择加组与对照组之间为 9.9%(均 p<0.001)。对于年龄≥50 岁的工人,选择加组与对照组相比,TIV 的接种率增加了 15.9 个百分点(p=0.024)。在干预组中,18-49 岁的工人和选择组中年龄≥50 岁的工人的 TIV 接种率没有变化。在 HLM 分析中,与接种率增加显著相关的因素是年龄较大、女性、公司以往的疫苗接种率和选择加干预。
接种激励、强化广告宣传和提供流感疫苗选择可提高工作场所的疫苗接种率。