Redding G M, Wallace B
Illinois State University.
J Mot Behav. 1998 Mar;30(1):44-50. doi: 10.1080/00222899809601321.
The phenomenal hypothesis that prism aftereffects depend upon sight of the limb was tested in a ball-throwing task during prism exposure; the participant's (N = 28) limb was either visible or not visible, but feedback from the moving ball was available during the exposure. Aftereffects were clearly demonstrated in both the visible- and nonvisible-limb conditions, and total aftereffect was larger for participants in the nonvisible-limb condition. Proprioceptive aftereffects were greater than visual aftereffects in the visible-limb group; however, the reverse was true for the nonvisible-limb group. Those results support a processing hypothesis in which sensory feedback, not phenomenal experience, is necessary.
在棱镜暴露期间的投球任务中,对棱镜后效取决于肢体视觉的这一显著假设进行了测试;参与者(N = 28)的肢体要么可见,要么不可见,但在暴露期间可获得来自移动球的反馈。在肢体可见和不可见条件下均清楚地证明了后效,并且在肢体不可见条件下参与者的总后效更大。在肢体可见组中,本体感受后效大于视觉后效;然而,在肢体不可见组中情况则相反。这些结果支持了一种加工假设,即感觉反馈而非现象体验是必要的。