• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丹毒与蜂窝织炎:122例回顾性研究]

[Erysipelas and cellulitis: a retrospective study of 122 cases].

作者信息

Concheiro J, Loureiro M, González-Vilas D, García-Gavín J, Sánchez-Aguilar D, Toribio J

机构信息

Departamento de Dermatología, Facultad de Medicina, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.

出版信息

Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009 Dec;100(10):888-94.

PMID:20038366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Erysipelas and cellulitis are relatively common cutaneous infections that can sometimes be the cause of a prolonged hospital admission. The objective of this study was to determine the most relevant epidemiologic factors and their influence on the length of hospital stay, comparing our results with those of previous studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of 122 patients admitted over a 5-year period to the dermatology department of our hospital with a diagnosis of erysipelas or cellulitis.

RESULTS

Patients with a diagnosis of erysipelas or cellulitis represented 8.6% of all admissions during the study period. The mean age was 58.93 years and the female to male ratio was 1.06:1. The most common site of involvement was on the legs (76.22%). Overweight or obesity was present in 42.6% of patients and tinea pedis was detected in 33.6% of cases. A skin abscess developed in 7.4% of cases. The mean length of admission was 10.20 days; length of stay increased with age and with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) on admission (P < .01 for both differences).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm general epidemiologic factors such as sex and age distributions, predominant site, past history, and length of hospital stay. In view of their predictive value for the length of hospital stay, we propose that age and the ESR on admission should be considered to be indirect indicators of disease severity.

摘要

背景

丹毒和蜂窝织炎是相对常见的皮肤感染,有时可能导致住院时间延长。本研究的目的是确定最相关的流行病学因素及其对住院时间的影响,并将我们的结果与以往研究的结果进行比较。

材料与方法

我们对我院皮肤科在5年期间收治的122例诊断为丹毒或蜂窝织炎的患者进行了一项回顾性、观察性横断面研究。

结果

在研究期间,诊断为丹毒或蜂窝织炎的患者占所有入院患者的8.6%。平均年龄为58.93岁,男女比例为1.06:1。最常见的受累部位是腿部(76.22%)。42.6%的患者存在超重或肥胖,33.6%的病例检测到足癣。7.4%的病例发生了皮肤脓肿。平均住院时间为10.20天;住院时间随年龄和入院时红细胞沉降率(ESR)的增加而延长(两者差异P <.01)。

结论

我们证实了性别和年龄分布、主要部位、既往史和住院时间等一般流行病学因素。鉴于它们对住院时间的预测价值,我们建议将年龄和入院时的ESR视为疾病严重程度的间接指标。

相似文献

1
[Erysipelas and cellulitis: a retrospective study of 122 cases].[丹毒与蜂窝织炎:122例回顾性研究]
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009 Dec;100(10):888-94.
2
Erysipelas and cellulitis: clinical and microbiological spectrum in an Italian tertiary care hospital.丹毒和蜂窝织炎:意大利一家三级护理医院中的临床与微生物学谱
J Infect. 2005 Dec;51(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.12.010.
3
[Clinical and Laboratory Factors Associated with Prolonged Hospital Stay among Patients with Cellulitis/Erysipelas].[与蜂窝织炎/丹毒患者住院时间延长相关的临床和实验室因素]
Acta Med Port. 2019 Jun 28;32(6):448-452. doi: 10.20344/amp.10735.
4
A population-based study of the epidemiology of acute adult burn injuries in the Calgary Health Region and factors associated with mortality and hospital length of stay from 1995 to 2004.基于人群的卡尔加里健康区域成人急性烧伤流行病学研究及与 1995 年至 2004 年死亡率和住院时间相关的因素。
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.10.003. Epub 2009 Feb 8.
5
Risk stratification and outcome of cellulitis admitted to hospital.住院患者蜂窝织炎的风险分层和结局。
J Infect. 2010 Jun;60(6):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
6
[A prospective study on erysipelas and infectious cellulitis: how are they dealt within hospital?].[丹毒与感染性蜂窝织炎的前瞻性研究:医院如何处理?]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2001 Mar;128(3 Pt 2):334-7.
7
Factors predisposing to acute and recurrent bacterial non-necrotizing cellulitis in hospitalized patients: a prospective case-control study.住院患者急性和复发性细菌性非坏死性蜂窝织炎的易患因素:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jun;16(6):729-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02906.x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
[Erysipelas. Retrospective study of 647 patients].[丹毒。647例患者的回顾性研究]
Tunis Med. 2004 Nov;82(11):990-5.
9
Recurrent erysipelas: 47 cases.复发性丹毒:47例。
Dermatology. 2007;214(1):52-7. doi: 10.1159/000096913.
10
Risk factors for abscess formation in patients with superficial cellulitis (erysipelas) of the leg.腿部浅表蜂窝织炎(丹毒)患者脓肿形成的风险因素。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Apr;168(4):859-63. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12148. Epub 2013 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing the host response for precision infectious disease diagnosis.利用宿主反应进行精准传染病诊断。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Dec 10;37(4):e0007824. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00078-24. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Diagnostic Value of Laboratory Parameters for Distinguishing Between Herpes Zoster and Bacterial Superficial Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.实验室参数对鉴别带状疱疹与细菌性浅部皮肤及软组织感染的诊断价值。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jan 7;100(1):adv00009. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3357.
3
Management of cellulitis and the role of the nurse: a 5-year retrospective multicentre study in Fako, Cameroon.
蜂窝织炎的管理及护士的作用:喀麦隆法科为期5年的回顾性多中心研究
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 23;12(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4497-4.
4
Risk factors associated with local complications of erysipelas: a retrospective study of 152 cases.丹毒局部并发症的相关危险因素:152例回顾性研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Feb 5;26:66. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.66.11096. eCollection 2017.
5
Acute Phase Reactants in Infections: Evidence-Based Review and a Guide for Clinicians.感染中的急性期反应物:循证综述及临床医生指南。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 3;2(3):ofv098. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv098. eCollection 2015 Sep.
6
Clinical and microbiological characteristics of purulent and non-purulent cellulitis in hospitalized Taiwanese adults in the era of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.社区相关性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌时代台湾住院成人脓性与非脓性蜂窝织炎的临床及微生物学特征
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 5;15:311. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1064-z.
7
Eponymous signs in dermatology.皮肤病学中的以人名命名的体征。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2012 Sep;3(3):159-65. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.101810.