Suppr超能文献

辅助多西他赛治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的成本效益:PACS 01 经济学研究结果。

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer patients: results of the PACS 01 economic study.

机构信息

Institut National pour la Santé et la Recherche médicale, unité 912, Marseille; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille.

Research Center in Knowledge Engineering (ERIC, EA3083), University of Lyon (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Lyon.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1448-1454. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp561. Epub 2009 Dec 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome. To deal with uncertainty due to sampling fluctuations, confidence regions around the ICERs were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were drawn up. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to assess the robustness of conclusions.

RESULTS

The mean cost of treatment was 33% higher with strategy FEC-D, but this difference decreased to 18% at a 5-year horizon. The ICER of FEC-D versus FEC100 was estimated to be 9665euro per QALY gained (95% confidence interval euro2372-euro55 515). The estimated probability that FEC-D was cost-effective reached >96% for a threshold of euro50 000 per QALY gained. If the price of taxane decreased slightly, the ICER would reach some very reasonable levels and this strategy would therefore be much more cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

The sequential use of FEC100 followed by docetaxel appears to be a cost-effective alternative, even when uncertainty is taken into account.

摘要

背景

我们利用 PACS 01 随机试验的数据,评估了阳性淋巴结乳腺癌患者采用多柔比星联合多西紫杉醇(Taxotere;FEC-D)与仅采用多柔比星(FEC100)治疗的成本效果。

患者和方法

1996 例患者评估了成本和结果,并估计了增量成本效果比(ICER),使用质量调整生命年(QALYs)作为结果。为了应对由于抽样波动引起的不确定性,计算了 ICER 的置信区间,并绘制了成本效果可接受性曲线。还进行了敏感性分析,以评估结论的稳健性。

结果

FEC-D 方案的治疗费用平均高出 33%,但在 5 年时这一差异降至 18%。FEC-D 与 FEC100 的 ICER 估计为每获得 1 个 QALY 需花费 9665 欧元(95%置信区间为 2372 欧元至 55515 欧元)。当阈值为每获得 1 个 QALY 花费 50000 欧元时,FEC-D 方案具有成本效果的概率估计超过 96%。如果紫杉醇的价格略有下降,ICER 将达到一些非常合理的水平,因此该方案将更具成本效果。

结论

序贯使用 FEC100 后再用多西紫杉醇似乎是一种具有成本效果的替代方案,即使考虑了不确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验