Suppr超能文献

预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子对接受FEC-D方案治疗的乳腺癌患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.

作者信息

Lee Esther K, Wong William W L, Trudeau Maureen E, Chan Kelvin K W

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb;150(1):169-80. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3309-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Abstract

5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide → docetaxel (FEC-D) has been associated with higher-than-expected rates of febrile neutropenia (FN) that meet the current guideline threshold of 20 % for primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We examined the cost-effectiveness of FEC-D with varying strategies of G-CSF prophylaxis from the perspective of the public payer in Ontario, Canada. A state-transition model was developed to compare three strategies: FEC-D with secondary prophylaxis (SP) only, PP starting with the first cycle of D, and PP starting with the first cycle of FEC. Analysis was conducted for a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, at a 10-year horizon. Results were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 2013 Canadian dollars. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5 %. Event rates, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Using filgrastim, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for starting PP with the first cycle of D and starting PP with the first cycle of FEC, compared to using SP only, were $57,886/QALY and $116,186/QALY, respectively. With pegfilgrastim, the ICERs for the same strategies were $90,735/QALY and $149,483/QALY. Compared to using filgrastim SP only, starting PP with D had a 24 % chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY, and a 99 % chance at a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY. Results were sensitive to FN-related parameters, such as the risk of FN per cycle with D and the associated mortality, but were robust to uncertainty in parameters related to breast cancer, such as the utilities and hazard of relapse. FEC-D with PP starting with the first cycle of D is most likely to be cost-effective, especially with increased risk of FN and mortality from FN.

摘要

5-氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星、环磷酰胺→多西他赛(FEC-D)与高于预期的发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)发生率相关,该发生率达到了目前使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行一级预防(PP)的20%的指南阈值。我们从加拿大安大略省公共支付方的角度,研究了采用不同G-CSF预防策略的FEC-D的成本效益。建立了一个状态转换模型来比较三种策略:仅采用二级预防(SP)的FEC-D、从多西他赛的第一个周期开始进行PP以及从FEC的第一个周期开始进行PP。对一组假设的50岁接受辅助化疗的早期乳腺癌患者进行了为期10年的分析。结果以质量调整生命年(QALYs)和2013年加拿大元表示。成本和效益按5%进行贴现。事件发生率、成本和效用均来自文献。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。使用非格司亭时,与仅采用SP相比,从多西他赛的第一个周期开始进行PP以及从FEC的第一个周期开始进行PP的增量成本效益比(ICERs)分别为每QALY 57,886加元和每QALY 116,186加元。使用培非格司亭时,相同策略的ICERs分别为每QALY 90,735加元和每QALY 149,483加元。与仅使用非格司亭SP相比,从多西他赛开始进行PP在支付意愿(WTP)阈值为每QALY 50,000加元时有24%的概率具有成本效益,在WTP阈值为每QALY 100,000加元时有99%的概率具有成本效益。结果对FN相关参数敏感,如多西他赛每个周期的FN风险及相关死亡率,但对乳腺癌相关参数的不确定性具有稳健性,如效用和复发风险。从多西他赛的第一个周期开始进行PP的FEC-D最有可能具有成本效益,尤其是在FN风险增加以及FN导致的死亡率增加时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验