Suppr超能文献

抗雌激素与抗孕激素对转化和未转化甾体受体的影响。

Effects of antiestrogen versus antiprogestin on transformed and nontransformed steroid receptors.

作者信息

Turner J W, Ruh M F, Ward D T, Ruh T S

机构信息

Department of Physiology, St Louis University School of Medicine, MO 63104.

出版信息

J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991 Feb;38(2):197-203. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90126-p.

Abstract

In order to determine if different physicochemical properties exist among antihormone-receptor complexes, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin RU486 with progesterone receptor (PR) versus the triphenylethylene antiestrogen H1285 (4-(N,N-diethyl-aminoethoxy)-4'-methoxy-alpha-(p-hydroxyphenyl-alp ha'- ethylstilbene] with estrogen receptor (ER) from rabbit uterine tissue. Contrary to other reports, we observed no difference in the sedimentation properties of transformed PR (4S) when bound by the antagonist RU486 versus the progesterone agonist R5020 in either cytosol or DEAE partially-purified receptor preparations analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 0.3 M KCl. In addition, we found no difference in the sedimentation properties of these receptor preparations in the presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate: the nontransformed RU486-PR and nontransformed R5020-PR both sedimented as a 6S species. These same results were obtained when the receptor preparation and gradient analysis were performed in the absence of monothioglycerol. Likewise, there was no change in the sedimentation properties of the transformed PR when the receptor, partially purified in the absence of molybdate, was analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 10 mM sodium molybdate to prevent receptor alteration during centrifugation. From DNA-cellulose assays performed with partially purified PR in the absence of molybdate we determined that the 4S form of R5020-PR and RU486-PR is transformed receptor; whereas in the presence of molybdate, the 6S species is nontransformed. In contrast, we found a different pattern of sedimentation when comparing transformed antiestrogen-receptor complexes with transformed estrogen-receptor complexes. In this case, transformed H1285-ER sedimented as 6S and estradiol-ER sedimented as 4S. We conclude from these experiments that these two antihormones, RU486 and H1285, may have different mechanisms of action in their antagonism of steroid hormone action. Antiestrogen stabilizes the salt-transformed ER as a dimer while antiprogestin appears to permit dissociation of the oligomeric form of the receptor to the monomeric form.

摘要

为了确定抗激素受体复合物之间是否存在不同的物理化学性质,我们比较了抗孕激素RU486与孕激素受体(PR)的相互作用,以及三苯乙烯抗雌激素H1285(4-(N,N-二乙氨基乙氧基)-4'-甲氧基-α-(对羟基苯基-α'-乙基己烯雌酚)与兔子宫组织雌激素受体(ER)的相互作用。与其他报道相反,我们观察到,在含有0.3 M KCl的蔗糖梯度上分析的胞质溶胶或DEAE部分纯化的受体制剂中,拮抗剂RU486与孕激素激动剂R5020结合时,转化型PR(4S)的沉降特性没有差异。此外,我们发现在存在10 mM钼酸钠的情况下,这些受体制剂的沉降特性没有差异:未转化的RU486-PR和未转化的R5020-PR均以6S形式沉降。当在不存在单硫甘油的情况下进行受体制剂和梯度分析时,也得到了相同的结果。同样,当在不存在钼酸盐的情况下部分纯化的受体在含有10 mM钼酸钠的蔗糖梯度上进行分析以防止受体在离心过程中发生改变时,转化型PR的沉降特性也没有变化。通过在不存在钼酸盐的情况下用部分纯化的PR进行DNA-纤维素分析,我们确定R5020-PR和RU486-PR的4S形式是转化受体;而在存在钼酸盐的情况下,6S形式是非转化的。相比之下,当比较转化型抗雌激素受体复合物与转化型雌激素受体复合物时,我们发现了不同的沉降模式。在这种情况下,转化型H1285-ER以6S形式沉降,而雌二醇-ER以4S形式沉降。我们从这些实验中得出结论,这两种抗激素RU486和H1285在拮抗甾体激素作用时可能具有不同的作用机制。抗雌激素将盐转化的ER稳定为二聚体,而抗孕激素似乎允许受体的寡聚形式解离为单体形式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验