Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Oct;20(5):555-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp195. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
Utilization of services is an important aspect of migrants' access to healthcare. The aim was to review the European literature on utilization of somatic healthcare services related to screening, general practitioner, specialist, emergency room and hospital by adult first-generation migrants. Our study question was: 'Are there differences in migrants' utilization of somatic healthcare services compared to non-migrants?'
Publications were identified by a systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE. Appropriateness of the studies was judged independently by two researchers based on the abstracts. Additional searches were conducted via the references of the selected articles. The final number of studies included was 21.
The results suggested a diverging picture regarding utilization of somatic healthcare services by migrants compared to non-migrants in Europe. Overall, migrants tended to have lower attendance and referral rates to mammography and cervical cancer screening, more contacts per patient to general practitioner but less use of consultation by telephone, and same or higher level of use of specialist care as compared to non-migrants. Emergency room utilization showed both higher, equal and lower levels of utilization for migrants compared to non-migrants, whereas hospitalization rates were higher than or equal to non-migrants.
Our review illustrates lack of appropriate epidemiological data and diversity in the categorization of migrants between studies, which makes valid cross-country comparisons most challenging. After adjusting for socio-economic factors and health status, the existing studies still show systematic variations in somatic healthcare utilization between migrants and non-migrants.
服务的利用是移民获得医疗保健的一个重要方面。本研究旨在综述欧洲有关第一代成年移民利用与筛查、全科医生、专科医生、急诊室和医院相关的躯体保健服务的文献。我们的研究问题是:“与非移民相比,移民在躯体保健服务的利用方面是否存在差异?”
通过系统检索 PUBMED 和 EMBASE 确定出版物。两名研究人员根据摘要独立判断研究的适宜性。通过选择文章的参考文献进行了额外的搜索。最终纳入了 21 项研究。
研究结果表明,与欧洲的非移民相比,移民在躯体保健服务的利用方面呈现出不同的情况。总体而言,移民接受乳房 X 光和宫颈癌筛查的就诊率和转诊率较低,每位患者与全科医生的接触次数较多,但通过电话咨询的次数较少,与非移民相比,接受专科护理的比例相同或更高。与非移民相比,急诊室的利用率或高或低,而住院率高于或等于非移民。
本综述表明,缺乏适当的流行病学数据以及研究中对移民的分类多样性,使得进行跨国比较极具挑战性。在调整了社会经济因素和健康状况后,现有研究仍显示移民和非移民在躯体保健服务利用方面存在系统性差异。